Cited by 10Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Sample Size and Repeated Measures Required in Studies of Foods in the Homes of African-American Families

Open access
Stevens, June, Bryant, Maria, Wang, Chin-Hua, Cai, Jianwen, Bentley, Margaret E.·2012·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Measurement of the home food environment is of interest to researchers because it affects food intake and is a feasible target for nutrition interventions. The objective of this study was to provide estimates to aid the calculation of sample size and number of repeated measures needed in studies of nutrients and foods in the home. We inventoried all foods in the homes of 80 African-American first-time mothers and determined 6 nutrient-related attributes. Sixty-three households were measured 3 times, 11 were measured twice, and 6 were measured once, producing 217 inventories collected at ~2-mo intervals. Following log transformations, number of foods, total energy, dietary fiber, and fat required only one measurement per household to achieve a correlation of 0.8 between the observed and true values. For percent energy from fat and energy density, 3 and 2 repeated measurements, respectively, were needed to achieve a correlation of 0.8. A sample size of 252 was needed to detect a difference of 25% of an SD in total energy with one measurement compared with 213 with 3 repeated measurements. Macronutrient characteristics of household foods appeared relatively stable over a 6-mo period and only 1 or 2 repeated measures of households may be sufficient for an efficient study design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.111.150060

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial sample size was calculated using a rule of thumb of 15 minimum subjects per indicator, resulting in 840 subjects for 56 indicators.

    “The initial sample size was calculated by using a rule of thumb calculation of 15 minimum subjects per indicator [98], resulting in 840 subjects for 56 indicators.”

    From Fear of missing out, social media influencers, and the social, psychological and financial wellbeing of young consumers (2025) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Statistical methods section describes sample-size calculations based on detectable differences between groups, not a minimum number of subjects per indicator. The Results report 80 participating households. Searches for the 15-subject rule and the 56-indicator, 840-subject calculation found no passage supporting the attributed rule; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Campbell KJ. Associations between the home food environment and obesity-promoting eating behaviors in adolescence. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:719-30.
  2. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
  3. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  4. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
  5. Crockett SJ, Potter JD, Wright MS, Bacheller A. Validation of a self- reported shelf inventory to measure food purchase behavior. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92:694-7.
  6. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Bryant M, Stevens J. Household food and beverage purchasing. Letter to the Editor. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:983-4, author reply 984-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevens, J., Bryant, M., Wang, C.-H., Cai, J., & Bentley, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Stevens, June
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
142
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1127
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159901220
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21CA125735)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924, R01 HD0422119)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
home food environment, sample size determination, repeated measures, African American families, primiparous women, energy density, energy from fat, dietary fiber, macronutrient composition, measurement stability, nutrition interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Energy Intake, Family, Female, Food, Food Analysis, Food Supply, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Research Design, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review