Cited by 143Vitamin D Research StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disorders

Retracted: Vitamin D Supplementation Affects the Beck Depression Inventory, Insulin Resistance, and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Open access
Sepehrmanesh, Zahra, Kolahdooz, Fariba, Abedi, Fatemeh, Mazroii, Navid, Assarian, Amin, Asemi, Zatollah, Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad·2016·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background Vitamin D may decrease depression symptoms through its beneficial effects on neurotransmitters, metabolic profiles, biomarkers of inflammation, and oxidative stress.Objective This study was designed to assess whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce symptoms of depression, metabolic profiles, serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and biomarkers of oxidative stress in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed in 40 patients between 18 and 65 y of age with a diagnosis of MDD based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a single capsule of 50 kIU vitamin D/wk (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) for 8 wk. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and postintervention to quantify relevant variables. The primary [Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which examines depressive symptoms] and secondary (glucose homeostasis variables, lipid profiles, hs-CRP, and biomarkers of oxidative stress) outcomes were assessed.Results Baseline concentrations of mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were significantly different between the 2 groups (9.2 ± 6.0 and 13.6 ± 7.9 μg/L in the placebo and control groups, respectively, P = 0.02). After 8 wk of intervention, changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were significantly greater in the vitamin D group (+20.4 μg/L) than in the placebo group (-0.9 μg/L, P < 0.001). A trend toward a greater decrease in the BDI was observed in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group (-8.0 and -3.3, respectively, P = 0.06). Changes in serum insulin (-3.6 compared with +2.9 μIU/mL, P = 0.02), estimated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (-1.0 compared with +0.6, P = 0.01), estimated homeostasis model assessment of β cell function (-13.9 compared with +10.3, P = 0.03), plasma total antioxidant capacity (+63.1 compared with -23.4 mmol/L, P = 0.04), and glutathione (+170 compared with -213 μmol/L, P = 0.04) in the vitamin D group were significantly different from those in the placebo group.Conclusion Overall, vitamin D supplementation of patients with MDD for 8 wk had beneficial effects on the BDI, indicators of glucose homeostasis, and oxidative stress. This trial was registered at www.irct.ir as IRCT201412065623N29.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/jn.115.218883This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]31. Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Jacka FN, Dodd S, Nicholson G, Berk M. Annual high-dose vitamin D3 and mental well-being: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2011;198:357-64.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sepehrmanesh, Z., Kolahdooz, F., Abedi, F., Mazroii, N., Assarian, A., Asemi, Z., & Esmaillzadeh, A.
Affiliations
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Asemi, Zatollah
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
146
Issue
2
Pages
243-248
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177838021
Cited by
143
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kashan University of Medical Sciences
  • Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
vitamin D supplementation, major depressive disorder, depression, Beck Depression Inventory, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, C-reactive protein, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, total antioxidant capacity, glutathione, lipid profile, glucose homeostasis, beta-cell function, retraction, research integrity, data falsification
MeSH terms
Adult, Antioxidants, Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Vitamin D, Oxidative Stress, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review