Cited by 22Innovations in Medical EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealth and Medical Education

Playing to our human strengths to prepare medical students for the future

Open access
Chen, Julie·2017·Korean Journal of Medical Education

Abstract

We are living in an age where artificial intelligence and astounding technological advances are bringing truly remarkable change to healthcare. Medical knowledge and skills which form the core responsibility of doctors such as making diagnoses may increasingly be delivered by robots. Machines are gradually acquiring human abilities such as deep learning and empathy. What, then is the role of doctors in future healthcare? And what direction should medical schools be taking to prepare their graduates? This article will give an overview of the evolving technological landscape of healthcare and examine the issues undergraduate medical education may have to address. The experience at The University of Hong Kong will serve as a case study featuring several curricular innovations that aim to empower medical graduates with the capabilities to thrive in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3946/kjme.2017.65

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chen, Julie
Venue
Korean Journal of Medical Education
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
193-197
ISSN
  • 1225-8067 (ISSN-L)
  • 2005-727X
  • 2005-7288
OpenAlex
W2751912040
Cited by
22
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean journal of medical education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, medical education, undergraduate medical curriculum, future of medicine, human strengths, empathy, physician role, curriculum innovation, University of Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Delivery of Health Care, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Empathy, Hong Kong, Humans, Learning, Physicians, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, Teaching, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review