The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and Segregation
Abstract
We develop a model of friendship formation that sheds light on segregation patterns observed in social and economic networks. Individuals have types and see type-dependent benefits from friendships. We examine the properties of a steady-state equilibrium of a matching process of friendship formation. We use the model to understand three empirical patterns of friendship formation: (i) larger groups tend to form more same-type ties and fewer other-type ties than small groups, (ii) larger groups form more ties per capita, and (iii) all groups are biased towards same-type relative to demographics, with the most extreme bias coming from middle-sized groups. We show how these empirical observations can be generated by biases in preferences and biases in meetings. We also illustrate some welfare implications of the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Does Climate Change Affect Real Estate Prices? Only If You Believe In It
Baldauf, M., Garlappi, L., & Yannelis, C. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz073 · Cited by 713
Homo Moralis--Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching
(2013) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta10637 · Cited by 371
When the Great Equalizer Shuts Down: Schools, Peers, and Parents in Pandemic Times
Agostinelli, F., Doepke, M., Sorrenti, G., & Zilibotti, F. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w28264 · Cited by 97
Preferential Attachment, Homophily, and the Structure of International Networks, 1816–2003
Maoz, Z. (2012) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/0738894212443344 · Cited by 80
Extended-family resources and racial inequality in the transition to homeownership
Hall, M., & Crowder, K. (2011) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.07.002 · Cited by 67
Interian, R., G. Marzo, R., Mendoza, I., & Ribeiro, C. C. (2023) · International Transactions in Operational Research · doi:10.1111/itor.13224 · Cited by 67
Credibility of climate change denial in social media
Samantray, A., & Pin, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0344-4 · Cited by 60
Self-citationAcosta, B. (2016) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343315618001 · Cited by 32
Adam, S., Häussler, T., Schmid-Petri, H., & Reber, U. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819855966 · Cited by 19
Excess reciprocity distorts reputation in online social networks
Livan, G., Caccioli, F., & Aste, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03481-7 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1003-1045
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1511088604
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 90.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.