The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence From French Firms
Abstract
We examine the sales of French manufacturing firms in 113 destinations, including France itself. Several regularities stand out: (i) the number of French firms selling to a market, relative to French market share, increases systematically with market size; (ii) sales distributions are similar across markets of very different size and extent of French participation; (iii) average sales in France rise systematically with selling to less popular markets and to more markets. We adopt a model of firm heterogeneity and export participation which we estimate to match moments of the French data using the method of simulated moments. The results imply that over half the variation across firms in market entry can be attributed to a single dimension of underlying firm heterogeneity: efficiency. Conditional on entry, underlying efficiency accounts for much less of the variation in sales in any given market. We use our results to simulate the effects of a 10 percent counterfactual decline in bilateral trade barriers on French firms. While total French sales rise by around $16 billion (U.S.), sales by the top decile of firms rise by nearly $23 billion (U.S.). Every lower decile experiences a drop in sales, due to selling less at home or exiting altogether.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282804322970814 · Cited by 4,030
Plants and Productivity in International Trade
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803769206296 · Cited by 2,980
Self-citationEstimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes *
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 · Cited by 2,436
Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing
Goffe, W. L., Ferrier, G. D., & Rogers, J. (1994) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)90038-8 · Cited by 1,610
Cited by
The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2121 · Cited by 4,459
New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?
Arkolakis, C., Costinot, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.94 · Cited by 1,707
Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook
Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014) · Handbook of International Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3 · Cited by 1,565
Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States
Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20141419 · Cited by 988
Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms
Yu, M. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12127 · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1453-1498
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168054555
- Cited by
- 1,148
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 257.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.