Development of a Quiz – Implementation of a (Self-) Assessment Tool and its Integration in Moodle
Open accessAbstract
Technology Enhanced Learning has become more popular in recent times and many organizations and universities use it as a key instrument in various teaching and training scenarios. At the University of Technology of Graz, some courses require randomized quizzes where question variables can be assigned by arbitrary mathematical functions and this feature is missing in the current solutions. This article describes the development of a quiz application that can be integrated into Moodle by utilization of the Learning Tools Interoperability protocol (LTI). The PHP application is built to support programmable questions that can contain JavaScript and HTML code. Teachers are able to build interactive, randomized quizzes, in which the random variables can be assigned with complex mathematical functions. Furthermore, the application provides a programmable grading mechanism. With this mechanism, it is possible for students to self-assess their performance, as well as for teachers to formally assess their students' learning success automatically and send the results back to Moodle (or other LTI compatible consumer applications).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Course developers utilise plug-ins to assist with automatic essay marking, randomising questions, and identifying ineffective questions.
“Course developers utilise plug-ins to assist with automatic essay marking, randomising questions, and identifying ineffective questions (Koneru, 2017; Schweighofer et al., 2019; Villa et al., 2018).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Schweighofer et al., 2019
Cites
Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions
Ćukušić, M., Garača, Ž., & Jadrić, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.018 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schweighofer, J., Taraghi, B., & Ebner, M.
- Affiliations
- Graz University of Technology (AT)
- Venue
- International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 141
- ISSN
- 1863-0383 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2994304437
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- Learning Tools Interoperability, Moodle integration, technology-enhanced learning, self-assessment, automated grading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review