Cited by 106Student Assessment and FeedbackOnline Learning and AnalyticsOnline and Blended Learning

Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions

Ćukušić, Maja, Garača, Željko, Jadrić, Mario·2014·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.018

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ćukušić, M., Garača, Ž., & Jadrić, M.
Affiliations
University of Split (HR)
Corresponding author
Ćukušić, Maja
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
72
Pages
100-109
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043563621
Cited by
106
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
27.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
online self-assessment, formative assessment, student success, pass rates, dropout rates, first-year students, generational differences, computer simulation, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review