Cited by 124Impact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonal Information Management and User BehaviorInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Exploring Smartphone Addiction: Insights from Long-Term Telemetric Behavioral Measures

Open access
Tossell, Chad, Kortum, Philip, Shepard, Clayton, Rahmati, Ahmad, Zhong, Lin·2015·International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)

Abstract

This study examined smartphone user behaviors and their relation to self-reported smartphone addiction. Thirty-four users who did not own smartphones were given instrumented iPhones that logged all phone use over the course of the year-long study. At the conclusion of the study, users were asked to rate their level of addiction to the device. Sixty-two percent agreed or strongly agreed that they were addicted to their iPhones. These users showed differentiated smartphone use as compared to those users who did not indicate an addiction. Addicted users spent twice as much time on their phone and launched applications much more frequently (nearly twice as often) as compared to the non-addicted user. Mail, Messaging, Facebook and the Web drove this use. Surprisingly, games did not show any difference between addicted and non-addicted users. Addicted users showed significantly lower time-per-interaction than did non-addicted users for Mail, Facebook and Messaging applications. One addicted user reported that his addiction was problematic, and his use data was beyond three standard deviations from the upper hinge. This study provides unique insight, as use data in previous studies has been self-reported, and this study used a naturalistic, non-intervention data logging approach over the course of a year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3991/ijim.v9i2.4300

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problematic cell-phone use includes harm, repeated physical, mental, social, work, or familial interruptions, preferring the cell phone to personal contact, frequent and constant consultations in brief periods, and insomnia and sleep disturbances.

    “Harm, repeated physical, mental, social, work, or familial interruptions, preferring the cell phone to personal contact (52–54); frequent and constant consultations in brief periods (3) with insomnia and sleep disturbances (55, 56).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [3]

  • The cell phone offers activities that can lead to problematic use.

    “From this perspective, the cell phone offers activities that can lead to problematic use (3, 27).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 124

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Do TMT, Blom J, Gatica-Perez D. Smartphone usage in the wild: a large-scale analysis of applications and context. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces 2011:353-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2070481.2070550 · DOI
  2. Perez EJP, Monje MTR, De Leon JMRS. Mobile phone abuse or addiction. A review of the literature. Adicciones 2012; 24(2);139- 152.
  3. Griffiths MD. Internet and video-game addiction. In Essau CA, ed. Adolescent addiction: Epidemiology, assessment and treatment. London: Academic Press. 2008; 231-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373625-3.50010-3 · DOI
  4. Griffiths M. Does Internet and Computer "Addiction" Exist? Some Case Study Evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2000; 3(2): 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/109493100316067 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Roberts JA, Pirog SF. A preliminary investigation of materialism and impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2013; 2(1):56-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JBA.1.2012.011 · DOI
  6. Yellowlees PM, Marks S. Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior 2007; 23(3):1447-1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.05.004 · DOI
  7. Backer-Grøndahl A, Sagberg F. Driving and telephoning: Relative accident risk when using hand-held and hands-free mobile phones. Safety Science 2011; 49(2): 324-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Beranuy M, Oberst U, Carbonell X, Chamarro A. Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:1182-1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Park WK. (2005) Mobile Phone Addiction. In: Ling R, Pedersen P, eds. Mobile Communications: Re-negotiation of the Social Sphere. London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 253-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-248-9_17 · DOI
  10. James D. (2012) Problematic use of mobile phones: Measuring the behaviour, its motivational mechanism, and negative consequences. Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/54749/ 1/Dianna_James_Thesis.pdf .
  11. Tossell CC, Kortum P, Shepard CW, Rahmati A, Zhong L. Getting Real: A Naturalistic Methodology for Using Smartphones to Collect Mediated Communications. Advances in Human Computer Interaction 2012: 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/815972 · DOI
  12. Shepard C, Tossell C, Rahmati A, Zhong L, Kortum P. LiveLab: Measuring Wireless Networks and Smartphone Users in the Field. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 2010; 38(3): 15-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1925019.1925023 · DOI
  13. Koo HY. Development of a cell phone addiction scale for Korean adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2009: 39(6): 818-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.818 · DOI
  14. Khazaal Y, Billeux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, et al. French validation of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychol Behav 2008; 11:703-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0249 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Widyanto L, Griffiths M. Internet Addiction: A Critical Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2006; 4(1): 31-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9009-9 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lee YK, Chang CT, Lin Y, Cheng ZH. The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 31: 373-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.047 · DOI
  17. Hoch SJ, Loewenstein GF. Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control. Journal of Consumer Research 1991: 17(4): 492-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208573 · DOI
  18. Morsella E, Bargh JA. (2011). Unconscious action tendencies: Sources of 'un-integrated'action. In: Decety J, Cacioppo JT, eds. The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 335-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342161.013.0022 · DOI
  19. Guy R, Chack C, Ngesi N, Mehigan TJ, Pitt I, Simbulan IS, Schleser M, Williams PW. (2010) Mobile Learning Reviewed. In: Guy R, ed. Mobile learning: Pilot projects and initiatives. Santa Rosa, CA.: Informing Science Press, pp 59-74.
  20. Jenaro C, Flores N, Gómez-Vela M, González-Gil F, Caballo C. Problematic Internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research & Theory 2007; 15(3): 309-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16066350701350247 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kandell JJ, Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998; 1(1): 11- 17.
  22. G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, "On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions," Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529-551, April 1955.

Authors
Tossell, C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L.
Affiliations
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Apple (United States) (US)
Venue
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
37
ISSN
1865-7923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155003464
Cited by
124
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
33.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
smartphone addiction, social media use, messaging apps, email use, Facebook use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review