Cited by 906Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender and Technology in Education

Does Internet and computer ‘addiction’ exist? Some case study evidence

Griffiths, Mark·2000·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

It has been alleged that social pathologies are beginning to surface in cyberspace (i.e., technological addictions). To date, there is very little empirical evidence that computing activities (i.e., internet use, hacking, programming) are addictive. Anecdotal evidence indicates that the typical "addict" is a teenager, usually male, with little or no social life, and little or no self-confidence. This article concentrates on five case studies of excessive computer usage. It is argued that of the five cases, only two of them describe "addicted" subjects. Addiction components criteria were used in the assessment. The excessive usage in the majority of cases was purely symptomatic and was highlighted how the subjects used the Internet/computer to counteract other deficiencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109493100316067

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problematic cell-phone use includes problematic and conscious use in dangerous situations or prohibited contexts, with social and familial conflicts and confrontations, and loss of interest in other activities.

    “Problematic and conscious use in dangerous situations or prohibited contexts (45) with social and familial conflicts and confrontations, as well as loss of interest in other activities (46–49).”

    From Cell-phone addiction: a review (2016) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]4. Griffiths, M.D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: Routledge.
  2. [6]6. Marks, I. (1990). Non-chemical (behaviourial) addictions. British Journal of Addiction, 85:1389-1394.
  3. [10]10. Selnow, G.W. (1984). Playing video games: The electornic friend. Journal of Communication, 34:148-156.
  4. [11]11. Wolfson, S. (1995, December). Star trek fan behaviour: 'It's addiction Jim, but not as we know it.' Paper presented at the British Psychological Society London Conference, Institute of Education, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffiths, M.
Affiliations
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Griffiths, Mark
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2000-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
211-218
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2070077008
Cited by
906
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 51
FWCI
41.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
internet addiction, hacking, programming, case studies, adolescents, social pathology, compensatory behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review