The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989-1993
Abstract
Poland is the only country in which popular protest and mass opposition, epitomized by the Solidarity movement, played a significant role in bringing down the communist regime. This book, the first comprehensive study of the politics of protest in postcommunist Central Europe, shows that organized protests not only continued under the new regime but also had a powerful impact on Poland's democratic consolidation. Following the collapse of communism in 1989, the countries of Eastern Europe embarked on the gargantuan project of restructuring their social, political, economic, and cultural institutions. The social cost of these transformations was high, and citizens expressed their discontent in various ways. Protest actions became common events, particularly in Poland. In order to explain why protest in Poland was so intense and so particularized, Grzegorz Ekiert and Jan Kubik place the situation within a broad political, economic, and social context and test it against major theories of protest politics. They conclude that in transitional polities where conventional political institutions such as parties or interest groups are underdeveloped, organized collective protest becomes a legitimate and moderately effective strategy for conducting state-society dialogue. The authors offer an original and rich description of protest movements in Poland after the fall of communism as a basis for developing and testing their ideas. They highlight the organized and moderate character of the protests and argue that the protests were not intended to reverse the change of 1989 but to protest specific policies of the government. This book contributes to the literature on democratic consolidation, on the institutionalization of state-society relationship, and on protest and social movements. It will be of interest to political scientists, sociologists, historians, and policy advisors. Grzegorz Ekiert is Professor of Government, Harvard University. Jan Kubik is Associate Professor of Political Science, Rutgers University.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Wedel, J. R. (1986) · Cited by 49
Cited by
Democratization as Deliberative Capacity Building
Dryzek, J. S. (2009) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414009332129 · Cited by 619
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace
Davenport, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510021 · Cited by 549
Time Will Tell? Temporality and the Analysis of Causal Mechanisms and Processes
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2011) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010390653 · Cited by 431
The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society
Howard, M. M. (2002) · Journal of Democracy · doi:10.1353/jod.2002.0008 · Cited by 268
Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship
Bernhard, M., & Karakoç, E. (2007) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0001 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J.
- Venue
- University of Michigan Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W2079626098
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989-1993. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3998/mpub.16117
- The paper
- Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J. (1999). Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989-1993. University of Michigan Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.