Cited by 276Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesMedical Research and TreatmentsHistory of Medicine Studies

Traditional Medicine in Contemporary China: A Partial Translation of Revised Outline of Chinese Medicine (1972) with an Introductory Study on Change in Present-Day and Early Medicine

Sivin, Nathan·1987

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/mpub.19942

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xu's intention was to enhance understanding of diagnosis and treatment of Cold Damage disorders.

    “As the title suggests, Xu's intention was to enhance the understanding of diagnosis and treatment of a unique type of medical disorder, Cold Damage disorders ( shanghan ).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivin, N.
Corresponding author
Sivin, Nathan
Published
1987
OpenAlex
W4300109822
Cited by
276
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.03
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medical Research and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
Keywords
traditional Chinese medicine, contemporary China, health care system, medical reform, integration of traditional and modern medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review