Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Their original paper cited other researchers (Fine, 1992; Taylor & Ussher, 2001) discussing the problematic idea of the researcher as a neutral conduit for true meaning.
“This hasn't just come from us; our original paper cited other researchers (Fine, 1992;Taylor & Ussher, 2001) discussing the problematic idea of the researcher as a neutral conduit for true meaning”
From ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Fine, 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 · Cited by 9,727 · see citing works
Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology.
Morrow, S. L. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250 · Cited by 3,199 · see citing works
A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000097254001 · Cited by 2,884 · see citing works
Fertile Obsession: Validity After Poststructuralism
Lather, P. (1993) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00112.x · Cited by 937 · see citing works
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2022) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Critical Participatory Action Research: A Feminist Project for Validity and Solidarity
Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2019) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684319865255 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationTolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Krieger, M. A. (2017) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838016659486 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Wasco, S. M. (2003) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838003256560 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Children’s experiences of domestic violence and abuse: Siblings’ accounts of relational coping
Callaghan, J. E. M., Alexander, J. H., Sixsmith, J., & Fellin, L. C. (2016) · Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1359104515620250 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2019) · Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review · doi:10.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Communication problems in the intensive care unit
Robillard, A. B. (1994) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf02393337 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Day, C. W. (1995) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192950210308 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Mertzman, T. (2008) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00356.x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Weiss, N. H., Duke, A. A., & Sullivan, T. P. (2014) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.899586 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fine, M.
- Corresponding author
- Fine, Michelle
- ORCID
- Fine, Michelle
- Venue
- University of Michigan Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Michigan Press
- Published
- 1992
- OpenAlex
- W4252052237
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 50.96
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- University of Michigan Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
