Cited by 48Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

The Herakleopolite Nome: A Catalogue of the Toponyms with Introduction and Commentary

Falivene, Maria Rosaria·1998

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3998/mpub.9749702

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By the third century BCE Abusir el-Meleq was at the centre of a wider region comprising the northern part of the Herakleopolites province and had close ties with the Fayum and the Memphite provinces.

    “Written sources indicate that by the third century BCE Abusir el-Meleq was at the centre of a wider region that comprised the northern part of the Herakleopolites province, and had close ties with the Fayum and the Memphite provinces, involving the transport of wheat, cattle-breeding, bee-keeping and quarrying42.”
  • In the early Roman Period, Abusir el-Meleq appears to have been the main centre in its own district.

    “In the early Roman Period, the site appears to have been the main centre in its own district42.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falivene, M. R.
Corresponding author
Falivene, Maria Rosaria
Published
1998
OpenAlex
W3140843285
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Keywords
Heracleion, Nome, Thebes, ancient Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review