Cited by 29Enzyme Production and CharacterizationAdvanced Scientific Research MethodsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Kinetic Studies of Alkaline Protease from Bacillus licheniformis NCIM-2042

Bhunia, Biswanath·2012·Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

An extensive investigation was carried out to describe the kinetics of cell growth, substrate consumption, and product formation in the batch fermentation using starch as substrate. Evaluation of intrinsic kinetic parameters was carried out using a best-fit unstructured model. A nonlinear regression technique was applied for computational purpose. The Andrew's model showed a comparatively better R2 value among all tested models. The values of specific growth rate (micronmax), saturation constant (KS), inhibition constant (KI), and YX/S were found to be 0.109 h-1, 11.1 g/l, 0.012 g/l, and 1.003, respectively. The Leudeking- Piret model was used to study the product formation kinetics and the process was found to be growth-associated. The growth-associated constant (alpha) for protease production was sensitive to substrate concentration. Its value was fairly constant up to a substrate concentration of 30.8 g/l, and then decreased.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4014/jmb.1206.06015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lower R2 value of 0.8713 in Monod's model suggested reasonable substrate or product inhibition on growth of the organism.

    “The lower correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.8713 found in Monod’s model suggested that there was reasonable substrate or product inhibition on growth of the organism (Bhunia et al. 2012).”

    From Kinetics of rapamycin production by Streptomyces hygroscopicus MTCC 4003 (2014) · cites this paper as Bhunia et al. 2012

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhunia, B.
Affiliations
Heritage Institute of Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhunia, Biswanath
Venue
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2012-12-28
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
1758-1766
ISSN
  • 1017-7825 (ISSN-L)
  • 1738-8872
OpenAlex
W2323996003
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
alkaline protease, Bacillus licheniformis, batch fermentation, enzyme production kinetics, starch substrate, cell growth kinetics, substrate consumption, product formation kinetics, Leudeking-Piret model, specific growth rate, yield coefficient, inhibition constant
MeSH terms
Bacillus, Bacterial Proteins, Computer Simulation, Culture Media, Fermentation, Kinetics, Models, Biological, Endopeptidases, Starch, Nonlinear Dynamics, Biomass, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review