Cited by 108Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchArtificial Intelligence Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering AI Systems: A Research Agenda

Bosch, Jan, Olsson, Helena Holmström, Crnkovic, Ivica·2021·Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly broadly adopted in industry. However, based on well over a dozen case studies, we have learned that deploying industry-strength, production quality ML models in systems proves to be challenging. Companies experience challenges related to data quality, design methods and processes, performance of models as well as deployment and compliance. We learned that a new, structured engineering approach is required to construct and evolve systems that contain ML/DL components. In this chapter, the authors provide a conceptualization of the typical evolution patterns that companies experience when employing ML as well as an overview of the key problems experienced by the companies that they have studied. The main contribution of the chapter is a research agenda for AI engineering that provides an overview of the key engineering challenges surrounding ML solutions and an overview of open items that need to be addressed by the research community at large.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4018/978-1-7998-5101-1.ch001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R. A.Munappy, 2020, Modeling Data Pipelines., Proceedings of the Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bosch, J., Olsson, H. H., & Crnkovic, I.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Venue
Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing
Publisher
IGI Global
Published
2021
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 2327-3453 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-3461
OpenAlex
W3149731118
Cited by
108
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18
FWCI
34.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
AI engineering, machine learning systems, data quality, model performance, compliance, engineering problems, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review