Cited by 133Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective

Dredge, Rebecca, Gleeson, John, de la Piedad Garcia, Xochitl·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.026

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dredge, R., Gleeson, J., & de la Piedad Garcia, X.
Affiliations
Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Dredge, Rebecca
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
36
Pages
13-20
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026085022
Cited by
133
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, social networking sites, child victims, victim perspective, emotional impact, social impact, behavioral effects, online harassment, cyberbullying intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review