Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Porous Materials for Bone Engineering

Open access
Simske, S.J., Ayers, R.A., Bateman, T.A.·1997·Materials Science Forum

Abstract

Maintaining bone geometric and structural integrity is a necessity for normal mobility. After fracture, bone disease or other conditions resulting in skeletal loss or compromise, porous materials offer the possibility for near faultless replacement of the normal bone material. Ceramics, and to a lesser extent, metals, are the predominant porous materials currently used in bone engineering. This latter term is used as a blanket term for orthodontics, orthopedics and related fields in which the replacement of bone is either required or selectively chosen. Because bone is a porous material, there is a physiological rationale for the use of porous materials in its replacement. Moreover, porous bone implant material is advantageous for the early incorporation of the implant into or apposed to the bony tissue surrounding it. There is, however, a difference in the size and extent of the bone and implant porosities for optimal bone incorporation of the material. This review intends to clarify both the nature of and reason for this difference. Accordingly, a review of the principal types of porous materials (organics, ceramics, metals, metallorganics and organoapatites and composites) used in bone engineering will be provided. This will springboard a consideration of the important engineering considerations of material property matching, machining and forming, corrosion and biocompatibility, fatigue and lifecycle, coating, and interfacial properties. The importance of matching the porous material to the particular bone engineering application will then be discussed. In providing this review, the authors hope to bring an appreciation of the complexity of the field to the fore, while also demonstrating how much has already been accomplished due to the efforts of many research groups. The ultimate porous bone implant, perhaps, is yet to be designed; however, there is reason to believe that such a material is not long in coming. We hope to demonstrate some possible pathways to this material. Outline The paper is constructed as follows.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.250.151

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Simske, S. J., Ayers, R. A., & Bateman, T. A.
Venue
Materials Science Forum
Published
1997-09
Volume
250
Pages
151-182
ISSN
  • 0255-5476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-9752
OpenAlex
W2079526454
Cited by
186
References
0
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porous Materials for Bone Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.250.151
The paper
Simske, S. J., Ayers, R. A., & Bateman, T. A. (1997). Porous Materials for Bone Engineering. Materials Science Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.250.151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.