The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Porous Materials for Bone Engineering
Open accessAbstract
Maintaining bone geometric and structural integrity is a necessity for normal mobility. After fracture, bone disease or other conditions resulting in skeletal loss or compromise, porous materials offer the possibility for near faultless replacement of the normal bone material. Ceramics, and to a lesser extent, metals, are the predominant porous materials currently used in bone engineering. This latter term is used as a blanket term for orthodontics, orthopedics and related fields in which the replacement of bone is either required or selectively chosen. Because bone is a porous material, there is a physiological rationale for the use of porous materials in its replacement. Moreover, porous bone implant material is advantageous for the early incorporation of the implant into or apposed to the bony tissue surrounding it. There is, however, a difference in the size and extent of the bone and implant porosities for optimal bone incorporation of the material. This review intends to clarify both the nature of and reason for this difference. Accordingly, a review of the principal types of porous materials (organics, ceramics, metals, metallorganics and organoapatites and composites) used in bone engineering will be provided. This will springboard a consideration of the important engineering considerations of material property matching, machining and forming, corrosion and biocompatibility, fatigue and lifecycle, coating, and interfacial properties. The importance of matching the porous material to the particular bone engineering application will then be discussed. In providing this review, the authors hope to bring an appreciation of the complexity of the field to the fore, while also demonstrating how much has already been accomplished due to the efforts of many research groups. The ultimate porous bone implant, perhaps, is yet to be designed; however, there is reason to believe that such a material is not long in coming. We hope to demonstrate some possible pathways to this material. Outline The paper is constructed as follows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors
Yang, S., Leong, K.-F., Du, Z., & Chua, C.-K. (2001) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632701753337645 · Cited by 2,234
Gomes, M. E., Ribeiro, A. S., Malafaya, P. B., Reis, R. L., & Cunha, A. M. (2001) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00211-8 · Cited by 375
Surface Modification of Ti6Al4V Open Porous Structures Produced by Additive Manufacturing
Pyka, G., Burakowski, A., Kerckhofs, G., Moesen, M., Van Bael, S., Schrooten, J., & Wevers, M. (2012) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201100344 · Cited by 309
Baino, F., Fiorilli, S., & Vitale-Brovarone, C. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Simske, S. J., Ayers, R. A., & Bateman, T. A.
- Venue
- Materials Science Forum
- Publisher
- Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 250
- Pages
- 151-182
- ISSN
- 0255-5476 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-9752
- OpenAlex
- W2079526454
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porous Materials for Bone Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.250.151
- The paper
- Simske, S. J., Ayers, R. A., & Bateman, T. A. (1997). Porous Materials for Bone Engineering. Materials Science Forum. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.250.151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.