Cited by 2,234Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical Research

The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors

Open access
Yang, Shoufeng, Leong, Kah-Fai, Du, Zhaohui, Chua, Chee-Kai·2001·Tissue Engineering

Abstract

In tissue engineering, a highly porous artificial extracellular matrix or scaffold is required to accommodate mammalian cells and guide their growth and tissue regeneration in three dimensions. However, existing three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering proved less than ideal for actual applications, not only because they lack mechanical strength, but they also do not guarantee interconnected channels. In this paper, the authors analyze the factors necessary to enhance the design and manufacture of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering in terms of materials, structure, and mechanical properties and review the traditional scaffold fabrication methods. Advantages and limitations of these traditional methods are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/107632701753337645

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The limited variation in pore sizes between different LC scaffolds meant these small differences would not influence the degradation effect observed.

    “However the limited variation in the pore sizes between different LC scaffolds [69,70] meant these small differences would not influence the degradation effect observed.”

    From <i>In vitro</i> degradation and mechanical properties of PLA-PCL copolymer unit cell scaffolds generated by two-photon polymerization (2016) · cites this paper as [70]

    The indexed passages on pore sizes (FIG. 3, page unavailable) and degradation (Materials, page unavailable) discuss separate topics. A search for pore-size effects on degradation found no passage addressing LC scaffolds or showing that small pore-size differences would not influence the observed degradation effect. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Vacanti, J., and Vacanti, C. The challenge of tissue engineering. In: Lanza R.P., Langer, R., Chick, W.L., eds. Prin- ciples of Tissue Engineering. Austin, TX: Academic Press, 1997, pp. 1-6.
  2. Chua, C.K., and Leong, K.F. Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications in Manufacturing. New York: Wiley, 1997.
  3. Steidle, C., Klosterman, D., Chartoff R., et al. Automated fabrication of custom bone implants using rapid proto- typing. Presented at the 44th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Long Beach, California, May 1999.
  4. Chu, G.T.-M., Brady, G.A., Miao, W., et al. Ceramic SFF by direct and indirect stereolithography. Presented at Materials Research Society, Fall Meeting, November 30-December 3, 1999, Boston, MA, pp. 119-123.
  5. Zein, I., Hutmacher, D.W., Schantz, J.T., et al. Processing of 3D scaffolds by fused deposition modeling. Presented at the International Workshop on Advances in Materials Science and Technology, Singapore, April 2000.
  6. Schantz, J.T., Hutmacher, D.W., Zein, I., et al. A study of human osteoblasts on poly(caprolactone)-scaffolds. Pre- sented at the International Workshop on Advances in Materials Science and Technology, Singapore, April 2000.
  7. Hollister, S.J., Levy, R.A., Chu, T.-M.G., et al. Design and manufacture of an orbital floor scaffold using image processing and rapid prototyping. Presented at the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Bioengi- neering Conference, New York, 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S., Leong, K.-F., Du, Z., & Chua, C.-K.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Leong, Kah-Fai
Venue
Tissue Engineering
Published
2001-12
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
679-689
ISSN
  • 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8690
OpenAlex
W2142720627
Cited by
2,234
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 128 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 146 · 2014: 150 · 2013: 142 · 2012: 132
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
tissue engineering scaffolds, scaffold design, scaffold fabrication techniques, scaffold mechanical properties, scaffold materials, scaffold architecture, tissue regeneration, 3D scaffolds
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Tissue Engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review