The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CD64 Expression Distinguishes Monocyte-Derived and Conventional Dendritic Cells and Reveals Their Distinct Role during Intramuscular Immunization
Open accessAbstract
Although most vaccines are administered i.m., little is known about the dendritic cells (DCs) that are present within skeletal muscles. In this article, we show that expression of CD64, the high-affinity IgG receptor FcγRI, distinguishes conventional DCs from monocyte-derived DCs (Mo-DCs). By using such a discriminatory marker, we defined the distinct DC subsets that reside in skeletal muscles and identified their migratory counterparts in draining lymph nodes (LNs). We further used this capability to analyze the functional specialization that exists among muscle DCs. After i.m. administration of Ag adsorbed to alum, we showed that alum-injected muscles contained large numbers of conventional DCs that belong to the CD8α+- and CD11b+-type DCs. Both conventional DC types were capable of capturing Ag and of migrating to draining LNs, where they efficiently activated naive T cells. In alum-injected muscles, Mo-DCs were as numerous as conventional DCs, but only a small fraction migrated to draining LNs. Therefore, alum by itself poorly induces Mo-DCs to migrate to draining LNs. We showed that addition of small amounts of LPS to alum enhanced Mo-DC migration. Considering that migratory Mo-DCs had, on a per cell basis, a higher capacity to induce IFN-γ–producing T cells than conventional DCs, the addition of LPS to alum enhanced the overall immunogenicity of Ags presented by muscle-derived DCs. Therefore, a full understanding of the role of adjuvants during i.m. vaccination needs to take into account the heterogeneous migratory and functional behavior of muscle DCs and Mo-DCs revealed in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Merad, M., Sathe, P., Helft, J., Miller, J., & Mortha, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074950 · Cited by 2,309
Human dendritic cell subsets: an update
Collin, M., & Bigley, V. (2018) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.12888 · Cited by 1,301
Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions
Jakubzick, C. V., Randolph, G. J., & Henson, P. M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.28 · Cited by 910
Properties of mouse and human IgG receptors and their contribution to disease models
Bruhns, P. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-01-380121 · Cited by 847
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Macrophages and Dendritic Cell Subsets in the Mouse Lung
Misharin, A. V., Morales-Nebreda, L., Mutlu, G. M., Budinger, G. R. S., & Perlman, H. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1165/rcmb.2013-0086ma · Cited by 838
Metadata
- Authors
- Langlet, C., Tamoutounour, S., Henri, S., Luche, H., Ardouin, L., Grégoire, C., Malissen, B., & Guilliams, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1751-1760
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2103793744
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CD64 Expression Distinguishes Monocyte-Derived and Conventional Dendritic Cells and Reveals Their Distinct Role during Intramuscular Immunization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.1102744
- The paper
- Langlet, C., Tamoutounour, S., Henri, S., Luche, H., Ardouin, L., Grégoire, C., Malissen, B., & Guilliams, M. (2012). CD64 Expression Distinguishes Monocyte-Derived and Conventional Dendritic Cells and Reveals Their Distinct Role during Intramuscular Immunization. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.