The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein
Abstract
Major basic protein (MBP) from both human and guinea pig eosinophils has been found to damage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni at concentrations as low as 2 × 10-5 M. This damage can be detected both by light microscopy and by measurement of release of 51Cr from labeled larvae. Damage is attributable in part to the basic properties of the molecule, since some other cations of comparable molecular weight, such as protamine and polyarginine, have comparable effects at equimolar concentrations. Other cations, however, fail to mediate damage, indicating that simply the possession of a positive charge is a necessary but insufficient prerequisite. The action of MBP is not selective, since mammalian target cells can also be damaged. Damage induced by MBP is associated with uptake of the material onto the parasite's surface, and both uptake and damage can be blocked by heparin. In addition, it has been found that MBP is released during the antibody-dependent reaction between human eosinophils and schistosomula, and can be detected both on the surface of the organism and free in small quantities in the supernatant. Damage mediated directly by eosinophils is not inhibitable by heparin, suggesting that the effect of eosinophils is attributable to the local release of high concentrations of MBP into a sequestered site adjacent to the parasite surface, rather than to a generalized release into the supernatant. These findings suggest that release of MBP may represent a major mechanism of eosinophil-mediated damage to schistosomula and, since MBP is uniquely associated in high quantities with the eosinophil, these results provide a partial explanation for the selective action of eosinophils on antibody-coated schistosomula.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oxygen metabolism and the toxic properties of phagocytes
KLEBANOFF, S. J. (1980) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-3-480 · Cited by 868
FAUCI, A. S., HARLEY, J. B., ROBERTS, W. C., FERRANS, V. J., GRALNICK, H. R., & BJORNSON, B. H. (1982) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-97-1-78 · Cited by 823
Activation of basophil and mast cell histamine release by eosinophil granule major basic protein.
O'Donnell, M. C., Ackerman, S. J., Gleich, G. J., & Thomas, L. L. (1983) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.157.6.1981 · Cited by 321
Self-citationStructure and bactericidal activity of an antibiotic dodecapeptide purified from bovine neutrophils.
Romeo, D., Skerlavaj, B., Bolognesi, M., & Gennaro, R. (1988) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81553-3 · Cited by 277
Eosinophils in Autoimmune Diseases
Diny, N. L., Rose, N. R., & Čiháková, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00484 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A., & David, J. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-01-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1589105822
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.122.1.221
- The paper
- Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A., & David, J. R. (1979). Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.122.1.221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.