Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein

Butterworth, Anthony E, Wassom, Donald L, Gleich, Gerald J, Loegering, David A, David, John R·1979·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Major basic protein (MBP) from both human and guinea pig eosinophils has been found to damage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni at concentrations as low as 2 × 10-5 M. This damage can be detected both by light microscopy and by measurement of release of 51Cr from labeled larvae. Damage is attributable in part to the basic properties of the molecule, since some other cations of comparable molecular weight, such as protamine and polyarginine, have comparable effects at equimolar concentrations. Other cations, however, fail to mediate damage, indicating that simply the possession of a positive charge is a necessary but insufficient prerequisite. The action of MBP is not selective, since mammalian target cells can also be damaged. Damage induced by MBP is associated with uptake of the material onto the parasite's surface, and both uptake and damage can be blocked by heparin. In addition, it has been found that MBP is released during the antibody-dependent reaction between human eosinophils and schistosomula, and can be detected both on the surface of the organism and free in small quantities in the supernatant. Damage mediated directly by eosinophils is not inhibitable by heparin, suggesting that the effect of eosinophils is attributable to the local release of high concentrations of MBP into a sequestered site adjacent to the parasite surface, rather than to a generalized release into the supernatant. These findings suggest that release of MBP may represent a major mechanism of eosinophil-mediated damage to schistosomula and, since MBP is uniquely associated in high quantities with the eosinophil, these results provide a partial explanation for the selective action of eosinophils on antibody-coated schistosomula.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.122.1.221

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A., & David, J. R.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1979-01-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
221-229
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1589105822
Cited by
370
References
0
FWCI
42.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.122.1.221
The paper
Butterworth, A. E., Wassom, D. L., Gleich, G. J., Loegering, D. A., & David, J. R. (1979). Damage to Schistosomula of Schistosoma Mansoni Induced Directly by Eosinophil Major Basic Protein. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.122.1.221

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.