Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 830

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes.

Sette, A, Vitiello, A, Reherman, B, Fowler, P, Nayersina, R, Kast, W M, Melief, C J M, Oseroff, C, Yuan, L, Ruppert, J, Sidney, J, del Guercio, M F, Southwood, S, Kubo, R T, Chesnut, R W, Grey, H M, Chisari, F V·1994·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The relationship between binding affinity for HLA class I molecules and immunogenicity of discrete peptide epitopes has been analyzed in two different experimental approaches. In the first approach, the immunogenicity of potential epitopes ranging in MHC binding affinity over a 10,000-fold range was analyzed in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice. In the second approach, the antigenicity of approximately 100 different hepatitis B virus (HBV)-derived potential epitopes, all carrying A*0201 binding motifs, was assessed by using PBL of acute hepatitis patients. In both cases, it was found that an affinity threshold of approximately 500 nM (preferably 50 nM or less) apparently determines the capacity of a peptide epitope to elicit a CTL response. These data correlate well with class I binding affinity measurements of either naturally processed peptides or previously described T cell epitopes. Taken together, these data have important implications for the selection of epitopes for peptide-based vaccines, and also formally demonstrate the crucial role of determinant selection in the shaping of T cell responses. Because in most (but not all) cases, high affinity peptides seem to be immunogenic, our data also suggest that holes in the functional T cell repertoire, if they exist, may be relatively rare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.153.12.5586

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 830

Metadata

Authors
Sette, A., Vitiello, A., Reherman, B., Fowler, P., Nayersina, R., Kast, W. M., Melief, C. J. M., Oseroff, C., Yuan, L., Ruppert, J., Sidney, J., del Guercio, M. F., Southwood, S., Kubo, R. T., Chesnut, R. W., Grey, H. M., & Chisari, F. V.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1994-12
Volume
153
Issue
12
Pages
5586-5592
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1675195038
Cited by
830
References
0
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.153.12.5586
The paper
Sette, A., Vitiello, A., Reherman, B., Fowler, P., Nayersina, R., Kast, W. M., Melief, C. J. M., Oseroff, C., Yuan, L., Ruppert, J., Sidney, J., del Guercio, M. F., Southwood, S., Kubo, R. T., Chesnut, R. W., Grey, H. M., & Chisari, F. V. (1994). The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.153.12.5586

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.