The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes.
Abstract
The relationship between binding affinity for HLA class I molecules and immunogenicity of discrete peptide epitopes has been analyzed in two different experimental approaches. In the first approach, the immunogenicity of potential epitopes ranging in MHC binding affinity over a 10,000-fold range was analyzed in HLA-A*0201 transgenic mice. In the second approach, the antigenicity of approximately 100 different hepatitis B virus (HBV)-derived potential epitopes, all carrying A*0201 binding motifs, was assessed by using PBL of acute hepatitis patients. In both cases, it was found that an affinity threshold of approximately 500 nM (preferably 50 nM or less) apparently determines the capacity of a peptide epitope to elicit a CTL response. These data correlate well with class I binding affinity measurements of either naturally processed peptides or previously described T cell epitopes. Taken together, these data have important implications for the selection of epitopes for peptide-based vaccines, and also formally demonstrate the crucial role of determinant selection in the shaping of T cell responses. Because in most (but not all) cases, high affinity peptides seem to be immunogenic, our data also suggest that holes in the functional T cell repertoire, if they exist, may be relatively rare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing
Yadav, M., Jhunjhunwala, S., Phung, Q. T., Lupardus, P., Tanguay, J., Bumbaca, S., Franci, C., Cheung, T. K., Fritsche, J., Weinschenk, T., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14001 · Cited by 1,186
CD8+ T cell differentiation and dysfunction in cancer
Philip, M., & Schietinger, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00574-3 · Cited by 1,052
Nine major HLA class I supertypes account for the vast preponderance of HLA-A and -B polymorphism
Sette, A., & Sidney, J. (1999) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s002510050594 · Cited by 635
Self-citationImmunotherapy of established (pre)malignant disease by synthetic long peptide vaccines
Melief, C. J. M., & van der Burg, S. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2373 · Cited by 594
Self-citationGreenbaum, J., Sidney, J., Chung, J., Brander, C., Peters, B., & Sette, A. (2011) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-011-0513-0 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sette, A., Vitiello, A., Reherman, B., Fowler, P., Nayersina, R., Kast, W. M., Melief, C. J. M., Oseroff, C., Yuan, L., Ruppert, J., Sidney, J., del Guercio, M. F., Southwood, S., Kubo, R. T., Chesnut, R. W., Grey, H. M., & Chisari, F. V.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5586-5592
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1675195038
- Cited by
- 830
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.153.12.5586
- The paper
- Sette, A., Vitiello, A., Reherman, B., Fowler, P., Nayersina, R., Kast, W. M., Melief, C. J. M., Oseroff, C., Yuan, L., Ruppert, J., Sidney, J., del Guercio, M. F., Southwood, S., Kubo, R. T., Chesnut, R. W., Grey, H. M., & Chisari, F. V. (1994). The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.153.12.5586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.