Cited by 25interferon and immune responsesCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

A dominant negative mutant of an IFN regulatory factor family protein inhibits both type I and type II IFN-stimulated gene expression and antiproliferative activity of IFNs

Thornton, A M, Ogryzko, V V, Dent, A, Sharf, R, Levi, B Z, Kanno, Y, Staudt, L M, Howard, B H +1 more·1996·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Type I (α,beta) and type II (γ) IFNs elicit antiproliferative and antiviral activities through two distinct transcription pathways involving 1) IRF family proteins and ISGF3, and 2) STAT1. We have employed a dominant negative strategy to study the role of IRF family proteins in eliciting the biologic activities of IFN. A truncated IRF protein retaining the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of ICSBP (a member of the IRF family) was stably transfected into U937 monocytic cells. Clones expressing DBD had markedly reduced ISRE-binding activity and were defective in expressing several type I IFN-inducible genes. STAT1 was one such type I IFN-inducible gene whose expression was also inhibited in DBD clones. As a result, the expression of several IFN-γ-inducible genes was also inhibited in these clones, indicating functional coupling of the type I and type II IFN transcription pathways. Furthermore, DBD clones grew more slowly than control clones and were refractory to antiproliferative effects of both types of IFNs. We found that IFN treatment of U937 cells leads to a G1 arrest and an increase in underphosphorylated retinoblastoma gene product. However, IFN treatment did not change the cell cycle profile, nor retinoblastoma gene product phosphorylation state in DBD clones. These data indicate that expression of DBD disrupts cell cycle regulatory mechanisms. Combined with the previously noted failure of DBD clones to elicit antiviral activity, the present work shows that IRF family proteins play an integral part in growth control activities of IFNs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.157.11.5145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thornton, A. M., Ogryzko, V. V., Dent, A., Sharf, R., Levi, B. Z., Kanno, Y., Staudt, L. M., Howard, B. H., & Ozato, K.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
1996-12-01
Volume
157
Issue
11
Pages
5145-5154
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1538444363
Cited by
25
References
0
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
IRF8, dominant-negative mutant, type I interferon, interferon-gamma, ISGF3, STAT1, interferon-stimulated gene expression, antiproliferative activity, cell cycle arrest, retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, U937 cells, antiviral activity
MeSH terms
Interferon Regulatory Factor-8, Animals, Antibodies, Carrier Proteins, Cell Division, Cell Line, Clone Cells, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Interferon Type I, Interferon-gamma, Mutation, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Rabbits, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transfection, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression, Retinoblastoma Protein, STAT1 Transcription Factor, Interferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3, Interferon-Stimulated Gene Factor 3, gamma Subunit, Interferon Regulatory Factors, Interferon Regulatory Factor-2, Interferon Regulatory Factor-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review