The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Both innate and acquired immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection are increased in IL-10-deficient mice
Abstract
IL-10-deficient mice were highly resistant to Listeria monocytogenes during the course of infection. An increased innate immunity was suggested by reduced bacterial burdens (as much as 50-fold) early (days 2 and 3) in the infection, as compared with control mice. In addition, in vitro stimulation of both IL-10-deficient peritoneal exudate cells and spleen cells with heat-killed Listeria resulted in a dramatically enhanced proinflammatory cytokine response (e.g., IL-12, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-1alpha, and IL-6). During later stages of a primary Listeria infection, the reduced bacterial burden in the infected organs of IL-10-deficient mice was accompanied by decreased tissue damage and earlier clearance of the pathogen, as well as a stronger Th1 polarization. The absence of IL-10 did not influence membrane-bound factors that stimulate Th cell responses, demonstrated by the finding of normal MHC class II, B7.1, and B7.2 surface expression on F4/80+ macrophages in vivo. IL-10-deficient mice were also more resistant to a secondary infection, accompanied by an enhanced Th1 response. The results presented in this work demonstrate that the absence of IL-10 augments innate and acquired immunity during primary and secondary L. monocytogenes infection by up-regulating proinflammatory type 1 cytokine responses. The resulting protective Th1 responses lead to an effective reduction of bacterial growth and tissue destruction and to an earlier clearance of the bacteria. The physiologic role of IL-10 during L. monocytogenes infection studies is discussed and compared with pathogenic infections that induce a more systemic cytokine response in IL-10-deficient mice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interleukin-10 and the Interleukin-10 Receptor
Moore, K. W., de Waal Malefyt, R., Coffman, R. L., & O'Garra, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683 · Cited by 6,737
Opal, S. M., & DePalo, V. A. (2000) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.117.4.1162 · Cited by 1,752
Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10
Saraiva, M., Vieira, P., & O’Garra, A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20190418 · Cited by 1,118
Type 1/Type 2 Immunity in Infectious Diseases
Spellberg, B., & Edwards, J. E. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/317537 · Cited by 911
The TSC-mTOR Signaling Pathway Regulates the Innate Inflammatory Response
Weichhart, T., Costantino, G., Poglitsch, M., Rosner, M., Zeyda, M., Stuhlmeier, K. M., Kolbe, T., Stulnig, T. M., Hörl, W. H., Hengstschläger, M., et al. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.012 · Cited by 801
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, W. J., Köhler, G., & Brombacher, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2259-2267
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1637461528
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Both innate and acquired immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection are increased in IL-10-deficient mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.158.5.2259
- The paper
- Dai, W. J., Köhler, G., & Brombacher, F. (1997). Both innate and acquired immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection are increased in IL-10-deficient mice. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.158.5.2259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.