The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HIV-1-Specific Mucosal CD8+ Lymphocyte Responses in the Cervix of HIV-1-Resistant Prostitutes in Nairobi
Abstract
Understanding how individuals with a high degree of HIV exposure avoid persistent infection is paramount to HIV vaccine design. Evidence suggests that mucosal immunity, particularly virus-specific CTL, could be critically important in protection against sexually acquired HIV infection. Therefore, we have looked for the presence of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells in cervical mononuclear cells from a subgroup of highly HIV-exposed but persistently seronegative female sex workers in Nairobi. An enzyme-linked immunospot assay was used to measure IFN-γ release in response to known class I HLA-restricted CTL epitope peptides using effector cells from the blood and cervix of HIV-1-resistant and -infected sex workers and from lower-risk uninfected controls. Eleven of 16 resistant sex workers had HIV-specific CD8+ T cells in the cervix, and a similar number had detectable responses in blood. Where both blood and cervical responses were detected in the same individual, the specificity of the responses was similar. Neither cervical nor blood responses were detected in lower-risk control donors. HIV-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies in the cervix of HIV-resistant sex workers were slightly higher than in blood, while in HIV-infected donor cervical response frequencies were markedly lower than blood, so that there was relative enrichment of cervical responses in HIV-resistant compared with HIV-infected donors. HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses in the absence of detectable HIV infection in the genital mucosa of HIV-1-resistant sex workers may be playing an important part in protective immunity against heterosexual HIV-1 transmission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003 · Cited by 1,189
The Influence of HLA Genotype on AIDS
Carrington, M., & O'Brien, S. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152346 · Cited by 722
Pudney, J., Quayle, A. J., & Anderson, D. J. (2005) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.105.043133 · Cited by 373
Recent Progress in Herpes Simplex Virus Immunobiology and Vaccine Research
Koelle, D. M., & Corey, L. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.1.96-113.2003 · Cited by 263
Reynolds, M. R., Rakasz, E., Skinner, P. J., White, C., Abel, K., Ma, Z.-M., Compton, L., Napoé, G., Wilson, N., Miller, C. J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.79.14.9228-9235.2005 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaul, R., Plummer, F. A., Kimani, J., Dong, T., Kiama, P., Rostron, T., Njagi, E., MacDonald, K. S., Bwayo, J. J., McMichael, A. J., & Rowland-Jones, S. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1602-1611
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2103059036
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HIV-1-Specific Mucosal CD8+ Lymphocyte Responses in the Cervix of HIV-1-Resistant Prostitutes in Nairobi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.164.3.1602
- The paper
- Kaul, R., Plummer, F. A., Kimani, J., Dong, T., Kiama, P., Rostron, T., Njagi, E., MacDonald, K. S., Bwayo, J. J., McMichael, A. J., & Rowland-Jones, S. L. (2000). HIV-1-Specific Mucosal CD8+ Lymphocyte Responses in the Cervix of HIV-1-Resistant Prostitutes in Nairobi. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.3.1602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.