The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increased DNA Vaccine Delivery and Immunogenicity by Electroporation In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
DNA vaccines have been demonstrated to be potent in small animals but are less effective in primates. One limiting factor may be inefficient uptake of DNA by cells in situ. In this study, we evaluated whether cellular uptake of DNA was a significant barrier to efficient transfection in vivo and subsequent induction of immune responses. For this purpose, we used the technique of electroporation to facilitate DNA delivery in vivo. This technology was shown to substantially increase delivery of DNA to cells, resulting in increased expression and elevated immune responses. The potency of a weakly immunogenic hepatitis B surface Ag DNA vaccine was increased in mice, as seen by a more rapid onset and higher magnitude of anti-hepatitis B Abs. In addition, the immunogenicity of a potent HIV gag DNA vaccine was increased in mice, as seen by higher Ab titers, a substantial reduction in the dose of DNA required to induce an Ab response, and an increase in CD8+ T cell responses. Finally, Ab responses were enhanced by electroporation against both components of a combination HIV gag and env DNA vaccine in guinea pigs and rabbits. Therefore, cellular uptake of DNA is a significant barrier to transfection in vivo, and electroporation appears able to overcome this barrier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DNA Vaccines: Progress and Challenges
Donnelly, J. J., Wahren, B., & Liu, M. A. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.633 · Cited by 448
Distribution of DNA Vaccines Determines Their Immunogenicity After Intramuscular Injection in Mice
Dupuis, M., Denis-Mize, K., Woo, C., Goldbeck, C., Selby, M. J., Chen, M., Otten, G. R., Ulmer, J. B., Donnelly, J. J., Ott, G., et al. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2850 · Cited by 327
Self-citationAn immunocompetent mouse model for the tolerance of human chronic hepatitis B virus infection
Huang, L.-R., Wu, H.-L., Chen, P.-J., & Chen, D.-S. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0608578103 · Cited by 294
Latta-Mahieu, M., Rolland, M., Caillet, C., Wang, M., Kennel, P., Mahfouz, I., Loquet, I., Dedieu, J.-F., Mahfoudi, A., Trannoy, E., et al. (2002) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/10430340260201707 · Cited by 114
Intradermal Electroporation of Naked Replicon RNA Elicits Strong Immune Responses
Johansson, D. X., Ljungberg, K., Kakoulidou, M., & Liljeström, P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029732 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Widera, G., Austin, M., Rabussay, D., Goldbeck, C., Barnett, S. W., Chen, M., Leung, L., Otten, G. R., Thudium, K., Selby, M. J., & Ulmer, J. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4635-4640
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1594950156
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased DNA Vaccine Delivery and Immunogenicity by Electroporation In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4635
- The paper
- Widera, G., Austin, M., Rabussay, D., Goldbeck, C., Barnett, S. W., Chen, M., Leung, L., Otten, G. R., Thudium, K., Selby, M. J., & Ulmer, J. B. (2000). Increased DNA Vaccine Delivery and Immunogenicity by Electroporation In Vivo. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.