The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development, Maturation, and Turnover Rate of Mouse Spleen Dendritic Cell Populations
Abstract
Three distinct subtypes of dendritic cells (DC) are present in mouse spleen, separable as CD4−8α−, CD4+8α−, and CD4−8α+ DC. We have tested whether these represent stages of development or activation within one DC lineage, or whether they represent separate DC lineages. All three DC subtypes appear relatively mature by many criteria, but all retain a capacity to phagocytose particulate material in vivo. Although further maturation or activation could be induced by bacterially derived stimuli, phagocytic capacity was retained, and no DC subtype was converted to the other. Continuous elimination of CD4+8− DC by Ab depletion had no effect on the levels of the other DC subtypes. Bromodeoxyuridine labeling experiments indicated that all three DC subtypes have a rapid turnover (half-life, 1.5–2.9 days) in the spleen, with none being the precursor of another. The three DC subtypes showed different kinetics of development from bone marrow precursors. The CD8α+ spleen DC, apparently the most mature, displayed an extremely rapid turnover based on bromodeoxyuridine uptake and the fastest generation from bone marrow precursors. In conclusion, the three splenic DC subtypes behave as rapidly turning over products of three independent developmental streams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turnover of naive- and memory-phenotype T cells.
Tough, D. F., & Sprent, J. (1994) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.179.4.1127 · Cited by 869
Self-citationWu, L., Li, C. L., & Shortman, K. (1996) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.184.3.903 · Cited by 400
Self-citation
Cited by
Cheng, Q., Wei, T., Farbiak, L., Johnson, L. T., Dilliard, S. A., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0669-6 · Cited by 2,383
Merad, M., Sathe, P., Helft, J., Miller, J., & Mortha, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074950 · Cited by 2,309
Mouse and human dendritic cell subtypes
Shortman, K., & Liu, Y.-J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri746 · Cited by 2,291
Self-citationBonifaz, L., Bonnyay, D., Mahnke, K., Rivera, M., Nussenzweig, M. C., & Steinman, R. M. (2002) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20021598 · Cited by 1,306
Monocyte-Mediated Defense Against Microbial Pathogens
Serbina, N. V., Jia, T., Hohl, T. M., & Pamer, E. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090326 · Cited by 1,123
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamath, A. T., Pooley, J., O’Keeffe, M. A., Vremec, D., Zhan, Y., Lew, A. M., D’Amico, A., Wu, L., Tough, D. F., & Shortman, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6762-6770
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2159431217
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development, Maturation, and Turnover Rate of Mouse Spleen Dendritic Cell Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.6762
- The paper
- Kamath, A. T., Pooley, J., O’Keeffe, M. A., Vremec, D., Zhan, Y., Lew, A. M., D’Amico, A., Wu, L., Tough, D. F., & Shortman, K. (2000). The Development, Maturation, and Turnover Rate of Mouse Spleen Dendritic Cell Populations. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.6762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.