The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Complexity of Protective Immunity Against Liver-Stage Malaria
Open accessAbstract
Sterile protective immunity against challenge with Plasmodium spp. sporozoites can be induced in multiple model systems and humans by immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium spp. sporozoites. The infected hepatocyte has been established as the primary target of this protection, but the underlying mechanisms have not been completely defined. Abs, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, cytokines (including IFN-γ and IL-12), and NO have all been implicated as critical effectors. Here, we have investigated the mechanisms of protective immunity induced by immunization with different vaccine delivery systems (irradiated sporozoites, plasmid DNA, synthetic peptide/adjuvant, and multiple Ag peptide) in genetically distinct inbred strains, genetically modified mice, and outbred mice. We establish that there is a marked diversity of T cell-dependent immune responses that mediate sterile protective immunity against liver-stage malaria. Furthermore, we demonstrate that distinct mechanisms of protection are induced in different strains of inbred mice by a single method of immunization, and in the same strain by different methods of immunization. These data underscore the complexity of the murine host response to a parasitic infection and suggest that an outbred human population may behave similarly. Data nevertheless suggest that a pre-erythrocytic-stage vaccine should be designed to induce CD8+ T cell- and IFN-γ-mediated immune responses and that IFN-γ responses may represent an in vitro correlate of pre-erythrocytic-stage protective immunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malaria: progress, perils, and prospects for eradication
Greenwood, B. M., Fidock, D. A., Kyle, D. E., Kappe, S. H. I., Alonso, P. L., Collins, F. H., & Duffy, P. E. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci33996 · Cited by 709
Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination
Ishizuka, A. S., Lyke, K. E., DeZure, A., Berry, A. A., Richie, T. L., Mendoza, F. H., Enama, M. E., Gordon, I. J., Chang, L.-J., Sarwar, U. N., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4110 · Cited by 367
Self-citationT cell-mediated immunity to malaria
Kurup, S. P., Butler, N. S., & Harty, J. T. (2019) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0158-z · Cited by 242
Regulation of CD8+ T cell responses to infection with parasitic protozoa
Jordan, K. A., & Hunter, C. A. (2010) · Experimental Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2010.05.008 · Cited by 80
Effector and memory CD8+ T cells as seen in immunity to malaria
Morrot, A., & Zavala, F. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00175.x · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Doolan, D. L., & Hoffman, S. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1453-1462
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1532851064
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Complexity of Protective Immunity Against Liver-Stage Malaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1453
- The paper
- Doolan, D. L., & Hoffman, S. L. (2000). The Complexity of Protective Immunity Against Liver-Stage Malaria. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.165.3.1453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.