The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Vivo Expression of Toll-Like Receptor 2 and 4 by Renal Epithelial Cells: IFN-γ and TNF-α Mediated Up-Regulation During Inflammation
Open accessAbstract
The reported requirement of functional Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 for resistance to Gram-negative pyelonephritis prompted us to localize the expression of TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA in the kidney at the cellular level by in situ hybridization. The majority of the constitutive TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA expression was found to be strategically located in the renal epithelial cells. Assuming that the TLR mRNA expression is representative of apical protein expression, this suggests that these cells are able to detect and react with bacteria present in the lumen of the tubules. To gain insight in the regulation of TLR expression during inflammation, we used a model for renal inflammation. Renal inflammation evoked by ischemia markedly enhanced synthesis of TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA in the distal tubular epithelium, the thin limb of Henle’s loop, and collecting ducts. The increased renal TLR4 mRNA expression was associated with significant elevation of renal TLR4 protein expression as evaluated by Western blotting. Using RT-PCR, the enhanced TLR2 and TLR4 mRNA expression was shown to be completely dependent on the action of IFN-γ and TNF-α. These results indicate a potential mechanism of increased immunosurveillance during inflammation at the site in which ascending bacteria enter the kidney tissue, i.e., the collecting ducts and the distal part of the nephron.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rehli, M., Poltorak, A., Schwarzfischer, L., Krause, S. W., Andreesen, R., & Beutler, B. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.275.13.9773 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Takeda, K., Kaisho, T., & Akira, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 · Cited by 6,143
Hayden, M. S., West, A. P., & Ghosh, S. (2006) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209943 · Cited by 1,178
Linking oxidative stress to inflammation: Toll-like receptors
Gill, R., Tsung, A., & Billiar, T. (2010) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.01.006 · Cited by 553
Ben Mkaddem, S., Pedruzzi, E., Werts, C., Coant, N., Bens, M., Cluzeaud, F., Goujon, J. M., Ogier-Denis, E., & Vandewalle, A. (2010) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2010.26 · Cited by 90
The microbiota and chronic kidney diseases: a double‐edged sword
Felizardo, R. J. F., Castoldi, A., Andrade‐Oliveira, V., & Câmara, N. O. S. (2016) · Clinical & Translational Immunology · doi:10.1038/cti.2016.36 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfs, T. G. A. M., Buurman, W. A., van Schadewijk, A., de Vries, B., Daemen, M. A. R. C., Hiemstra, P. S., & van ’t Veer, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1286-1293
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W1511030747
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.