Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Roles for Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 in the Regulation of Neutrophil Activation and Life Span

Sabroe, Ian, Prince, Lynne R, Jones, Elizabeth C, Horsburgh, Malcolm J, Foster, Simon J, Vogel, Stefanie N, Dower, Steven K, Whyte, Moira K B·2003·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Neutrophil responses to commercial LPS, a dual Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 activator, are regulated by TLR expression, but are amplified by contaminating monocytes in routine cell preparations. Therefore, we investigated the individual roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in highly purified, monocyte-depleted neutrophil preparations, using selective ligands (TLR2, Pam3CysSerLys4 and Staphylococcus aureus peptidoglycan; TLR4, purified LPS). Activation of either TLR2 or TLR4 caused changes in adhesion molecule expression, respiratory burst (alone, and synergistically with fMLP), and IL-8 generation, which was, in part, dependent upon p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Neutrophils also responded to Pam3CysSerLys4 and purified LPS with down-regulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR2 and, to a lesser extent, down-regulation of CXCR1. TLR4 was the principal regulator of neutrophil survival, and TLR2 signals showed relatively less efficacy in preventing constitutive apoptosis over short time courses. TLR4-mediated neutrophil survival depended upon signaling via NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Prolonged neutrophil survival required both TLR4 activation and the presence of monocytes. TLR4 activation of monocytes was associated with the release of neutrophil survival factors, which was not evident with TLR2 activation, and TLR2 activation in monocyte/neutrophil cocultures did not prevent late neutrophil apoptosis. Thus, TLRs are important regulators of neutrophil activation and survival, with distinct and separate roles for TLR2 and TLR4 in neutrophil responses. TLR4 signaling presents itself as a pharmacological target that may allow therapeutic modulation of neutrophil survival by direct and indirect mechanisms at sites of inflammation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.170.10.5268

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Sabroe, I., Prince, L. R., Jones, E. C., Horsburgh, M. J., Foster, S. J., Vogel, S. N., Dower, S. K., & Whyte, M. K. B.
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2003-05
Volume
170
Issue
10
Pages
5268-5275
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W1944560965
Cited by
351
References
1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.