Cited by 270Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Host defense and pathogenesis in Staphylococcus aureus infections

Open access
DeLeo, Frank R., Diep, Binh An, Otto, Michael·2009·Infectious Disease Clinics of North America

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is the most abundant cause of bacterial infections in the United States. As such, the pathogen has devised means to circumvent destruction by the innate immune system. Neutrophils are a critical component of innate immunity and the primary cellular defense against S aureus infections. This article reviews human neutrophil function in the context of S aureus virulence mechanisms and provides an overview of community-associated methicillin-resistant S aureus pathogenicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.003

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) plays a role in the neutrophil killing of Gram-positive bacteria, inhibiting their growth.

    “Peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) plays a role in the neutrophil killing of Gram-positive bacteria [38], inhibiting their growth.”

    From The Role of Reactive Species on Innate Immunity (2022) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLeo, F. R., Diep, B. A., & Otto, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
DeLeo, Frank R.
Venue
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
17-34
ISSN
0891-5520 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084838489
Cited by
269
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infectious Disease Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Z01AI000900)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, host defense, innate immunity, neutrophils, virulence mechanisms, community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, pathogenesis, bacterial infection
MeSH terms
Humans, Neutrophils, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Virulence, Virulence Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review