The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide–MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data
Open accessAbstract
Cytotoxic T cells are of central importance in the immune system’s response to disease. They recognize defective cells by binding to peptides presented on the cell surface by MHC class I molecules. Peptide binding to MHC molecules is the single most selective step in the Ag-presentation pathway. Therefore, in the quest for T cell epitopes, the prediction of peptide binding to MHC molecules has attracted widespread attention. In the past, predictors of peptide–MHC interactions have primarily been trained on binding affinity data. Recently, an increasing number of MHC-presented peptides identified by mass spectrometry have been reported containing information about peptide-processing steps in the presentation pathway and the length distribution of naturally presented peptides. In this article, we present NetMHCpan-4.0, a method trained on binding affinity and eluted ligand data leveraging the information from both data types. Large-scale benchmarking of the method demonstrates an increase in predictive performance compared with state-of-the-art methods when it comes to identification of naturally processed ligands, cancer neoantigens, and T cell epitopes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mutant MHC class II epitopes drive therapeutic immune responses to cancer
Kreiter, S., Vormehr, M., van de Roemer, N., Diken, M., Löwer, M., Diekmann, J., Boegel, S., Schrörs, B., Vascotto, F., Castle, J. C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14426 · Cited by 1,243
Cited by
Grifoni, A., Weiskopf, D., Ramirez, S. I., Mateus, J., Dan, J. M., Moderbacher, C. R., Rawlings, S. A., Sutherland, A., Premkumar, L., Jadi, R. S., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015 · Cited by 3,595
Self-citationReynisson, B., Alvarez, B., Paul, S., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa379 · Cited by 2,361
Self-citationBraun, D. A., Hou, Y., Bakouny, Z., Ficial, M., Sant’ Angelo, M., Forman, J., Ross-Macdonald, P., Berger, A. C., Jegede, O. A., Elagina, L., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0839-y · Cited by 992
Advances in the development of personalized neoantigen-based therapeutic cancer vaccines
Blass, E., & Ott, P. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-00460-2 · Cited by 1,042
Neoantigens: promising targets for cancer therapy
Xie, N., Shen, G., Gao, W., Huang, Z., Huang, C., & Fu, L. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01270-x · Cited by 1,020
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurtz, V., Paul, S., Andreatta, M., Marcatili, P., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-11-01
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3360-3368
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2953065444
- Cited by
- 1,470
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide–MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4049/jimmunol.1700893
- The paper
- Jurtz, V., Paul, S., Andreatta, M., Marcatili, P., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M. (2017). NetMHCpan-4.0: Improved Peptide–MHC Class I Interaction Predictions Integrating Eluted Ligand and Peptide Binding Affinity Data. The Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1700893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.