Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Papillomavirus Can Escape Immune Recognition through Langerhans Cell Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Activation

Fausch, Steven C, Fahey, Laura M, Da Silva, Diane M, Kast, W Martin·2005·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of cervical epithelium is linked to the generation of cervical cancer. Although most women infected with HPV clear their lesions, the long latency period from infection to resolution indicates that HPV evolved immune escape mechanisms. Dendritic cells, which are targeted by vaccination procedures, incubated with HPV virus-like particles induce an HPV-specific immune response. Langerhans cells (LC), which are located at the sites of primary infection, do not induce a response implicating the targeting of LC as an immune escape mechanism used by HPV. LC incubated with HPV virus-like particles up-regulate the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K) pathway and down-regulate MAPK pathways. With the inhibition of PI3-K and incubation with HPV virus-like particles, LC initiate a potent HPV-specific response. PI3-K activation in LC defines a novel escape mechanism used by HPV, and PI3-K inhibition may serve as an effective clinical target to enhance HPV immunity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.7172

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 1999, J. Pathol., 12
  2. 2002, N. Engl. J. Med., 1645
  3. 2002, Adv. Cancer Res., 113
  4. 1992, Int. J. Cancer, 45
  5. 1986, Br. J. Dermatol., 681
  6. 1996, Cancer Res., 582
  7. 2002, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 59
  8. 2000, Blood, 1039
  9. 1998, Nature, 245
  10. 2000, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 767
  11. 2000, Trends Microbiol., 410
  12. 2001, Immunity, 867
  13. 2002, J. Immunol., 3242
  14. 2003, Cancer Res., 3478
  15. 1998, J. Exp. Med., 961
  16. 2001, Nat. Immunol., 1151
  17. 2002, Arthritis Rheum., 1504
  18. 1997, Nat. Struct. Biol., 311
  19. 1998, Immunol. Today, 80
  20. 1997, J. Biol. Chem., 21096
  21. 2001, Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol., 615
  22. 2002, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 489
  23. 2002, Nat. Immunol., 875
  24. 1994, J. Biol. Chem., 5241
  25. 1995, J. Immunol., 5934
  26. 1975, Cancer Res., 1375
  27. 1994, J. Cell Sci., 3363
  28. 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 22366
  29. 1999, Trends Biochem. Sci., 186
  30. 2003, Cell. Signal., 37
  31. 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 492
  32. 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 18934
  33. 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 32124
  34. 2000, Cancer Res., 1457

Cited by

See all 60

Metadata

Authors
Fausch, S. C., Fahey, L. M., Da Silva, D. M., & Kast, W. M.
Affiliations
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, CA 90089
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
174
Issue
11
Pages
7172-7178
ISSN
  • 0022-1767
  • 1550-6606
Cited by
60
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review