Cited by 35Complement system in diseasesBiomarkers in Disease MechanismsCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema

Self versus nonself discrimination by the soluble complement regulators factor H and FHL-1

Dopler, Arthur, Guntau, Leonie, Harder, Markus J, Palmer, Annette, Höchsmann, Britta, Schrezenmeier, Hubert, Simmet, Thomas, Huber-Lang, Markus +1 more·2019·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

The plasma proteins Factor H (FH) and its alternate splice variant FH-like protein 1 (FHL-1) are the major regulators of the complement alternative pathway. The indiscriminate nature of alternative pathway activation necessitates the regulators to be host selective, but the underlying principles of selectivity remained largely elusive. By analyzing human FH and FHL-1 for protection of different host and foreign cells (rabbit and yeast), we uncovered a 2-fold discriminatory mechanism of FH in favor of self: relative to FHL-1, FH exhibits a regulatory benefit on self but importantly, also, a regulatory penalty on nonself surfaces, yielding a selectivity factor of ∼2.4 for sialylated host surfaces. We further show that FHL-1 possesses higher regulatory activity than known but is relatively unselective. The reason for this unexpected high activity of FHL-1 is the observation that the complement regulatory site in FH exceeds the established first four domains. Affinity for C3b, cofactor and decay-accelerating activities, and serum assays demonstrate that the regulatory site extends domains 1–4 and includes domains 5–7. But unlike FH, FHL-1 exhibits a fast plasma clearance in mice, occurs sparsely in human plasma (at one fortieth of the FH concentration), and resists deregulation by FH-related proteins. These physiological differences and its late phylogenetic occurrence argue that FHL-1 is crucial for local rather than systemic compartments. In conclusion, we demonstrate a 2-fold discriminatory power of FH to promote selectivity for self over foreign and show that FHL-1 is more active than known but specialized for regulation on local tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1801545

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dopler, A., Guntau, L., Harder, M. J., Palmer, A., Höchsmann, B., Schrezenmeier, H., Simmet, T., Huber-Lang, M., & Schmidt, C. Q.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Dopler, Arthur
  • Guntau, Leonie
  • Simmet, Thomas
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
202
Issue
7
Pages
2082-2094
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2912565373
Cited by
35
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Keywords
complement factor H, FHL1, alternative complement pathway, complement regulation, self/non-self discrimination, sialylation, plasma clearance, host selectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Complement Activation, Complement Pathway, Alternative, Humans, Complement Factor H, Self Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review