Cited by 23Paleopathology and ancient diseasesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesHistory of Medicine Studies

CRANIAL DEFORMATION AS THE CAUSE OF DEATH FOR A CHILD FROM THE CHILLON RIVER VALLEY, PERU

Open access
Mendonça de Souza, Sheila M.F., Reinhard, Karl J, Lessa, Andrea·2008·Chungará (Arica)

Abstract

Two small mummy bundles, found in a tomb at the Chillon River Valley, Lima Plains, Peru exist in the collections of the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.They were donated to the collections at the beginning of the 20th century.A multidisciplinary team is now curating and studying them.CT scans confirmed both skeletons were of individuals less than one year old at death.One of the bundles is intact and will be preserved and displayed.The other one was partly decomposed and the authors received permission to unwrap it to analyze the bones in details.Mites and pollen analysis were performed and the bones and artifacts were described.The cranium of a four to six month-old child, had a perforated necrotic occipital bone that possibly related to cause of death.Endosteal new bone reaction, a flattened area at the occipital squamae and a parietal sulcus associated with a zone of frontparietal resorption were also found.A pathognomonic periosteal reaction at the occipital and parietals, along the lambdoid suture, pointed to the compression of the skull that could explain the trauma, ischemic necrosis and subsequent infection.The cultural context suggests that the bundle could belong to a late Inca burial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4067/s0717-73562008000100005

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008) argue that modifying an infant's head in the Chillón Valley, Peru caused death.

    “Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008) argue that the act of modifying the head of an infant from the Chillón Valley in Peru was the cause of death”

    From Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes (2020) · cites this paper as Mendonça de Souza et al. (2008)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aufderheide, A.C. and C. Rodriguez-Martin, editors 1998 The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Human Paleopathology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. Cockburn, A., E. Cockburn and T.A. Reyman, editors 1998 Mummies, Diseases & Ancient Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  3. Guillén, S. 1992 The Chinchorro Culture: Mummies and Crania in the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Coastal Adaptation in the South Central Andes. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Anthropology. University of Michigan, USA.
  4. Hrdlicka, A. 1908 Physiological and medical observations among the in- dians of Southwestern New Mexico. Papers of the Peabody Museum Bureau of Archaeology and Ethnology 15:115-170. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  5. Ohtsuki, F. 1977 Developmental change of the cranial bone thikness in the human fetal period. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 46:141-154.
  6. Ortner, D.J., W.J. Butler, J. Cafarella and L. Milligan 2001 Evidence of probable scurvy in subadults from ar- chaeological sites in North America. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 114:343-351.
  7. White, C.D. 1996 Sutural effects of front-occipital cranial modifications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 100:397- 410.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mendonça de Souza, S. M. F., Reinhard, K. J., & Lessa, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (BR)
Venue
Chungará (Arica)
Published
2008-06
Volume
40
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0716-1182 (ISSN-L)
  • 0717-7356
OpenAlex
W2131969640
Cited by
23
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Chungara (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
Keywords
cranial deformation, infant mortality, causes of death, periosteal reaction, pollen analysis, bone pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review