Cited by 4Health Education and ValidationInnovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Development and Effects of Supplementary Material about Electronic Fetal Monitoring for Nursing Students

Open access
Yeom, Gye Jeong, Kim, Il-OK·2016·Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop supplementary material about the electronic fetal monitoring for nursing students, and to test the effects on electronic fetal monitoring related knowledge and confidence on nursing performance in delivery room. METHODS: Totally 58 nursing students were recruited either experimental group (n=30) or a control group (n=28). A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was employed to test the effects on fetal monitoring related knowledge and confidence on nursing performance in delivery room. The supplementary material about the electronic fetal monitoring was developed based on Analysis, Design, Development, Implement and Evaluation (ADDIE) model. Fetal monitoring related knowledge and confidence on nursing performance in delivery room were self-reported by the scales that author developed. Data were collected at pre-test and after the 6-week intervention. RESULTS: There was significant difference in confidence on nursing performance in delivery room between two groups after intervention. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the importance of the supplementary material about the electronic fetal monitoring for nursing students to improve confidence on nursing performance in delivery room.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.1.21

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies show that only supplementary materials for understanding and performing EFM are utilized in self-directed learning, and education on high fidelity simulation is provided, both of which are inadequate for developing overall nursing skills.

    “However, previous studies show that only supplementary materials for understanding and performing EFM are utilized in self-directed learning [12], and education on high fidelity simulation is provided, both of which, are inadequate for developing overall nursing skills [14], thus highlighting the need for various educational methods for nursing students’ education and training.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeom, G. J., & Kim, I.-O.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nursing, Kyongbuk Science College, Chilgok, Korea.
  • Sahmyook University (KR)
Venue
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
Published
2016
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
21
ISSN
  • 1225-9543 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-1640
  • 2093-7695
OpenAlex
W2321481077
Cited by
4
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
Locations
  • Korean journal of women health nursing/Yeoseong geon'gang ganho hag'hoeji/Yeoseong geon-gang ganho hakoeji (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
fetal heart rate monitoring, nursing students, supplementary teaching materials, ADDIE model, nursing knowledge, obstetric nursing education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review