CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesHealth Sciences Research and Education

Student Experience and Satisfaction with Clinical Nursing Practice in Women's Health Nursing

Open access
Kim, Yunmi, Chun, Nami, Lee, Eun Hee, Cho, In Sook, Ahn, Sukhee, Kim, Jeung-Im, Hur, Myung Haeng, Lee, Sook-Hee +4 more·2011·Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
DOI 10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.3.225
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify students' experiences of performance and their satisfaction with clinical nursing practice in Women's health nursing. METHODS: Data was collected using questionnaire consisting of 104; 89,; and 82 nursing activities with 12; 10; and 7 domains for delivery floor, obstetric, and gynecologic wards retrospectively. Five hundred ninety nursing students from 10 four year and one three year colleges, were recruited and selected for data collection. RESULTS: Site specific core nursing activities among top 15 items of performed experience were: interpreting fetal monitoring; massage for pain reduction; breathing technique; perineal pad change; non stress test; manual check for uterine contraction; and position change for the delivery floor. Experiences of clinical nursing practice for the obstetric ward and the gynecologic ward were identified and ranked as well. Observation of delivery, measurement & test during labor and observation of anesthesia and operation were the highest ranked activity domains of satisfaction for delivery floor, obstetric and gynecologic wards retrospectively. CONCLUSION: Discussions are needed to standardize curriculum for clinical practice in women's health nursing initiated at the level of Korean Society of Womens' Health Nursing by reflecting this result. Strategic approaches are emphasized in order to enhance a collaboration between clinical fields and colleges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.3.225

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kim, Y., Chun, N., Lee, E. H., Cho, I. S., Ahn, S., Kim, J.-I., Hur, M. H., Lee, S.-H., Lee, H.-K., Chung, C. W., Kang, N. M., & Kim, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Sungshin Women's University (KR)
  • Gangneung–Wonju National University (KR)
  • Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Inha University, Korea.
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
  • Soonchunhyang University (KR)
  • Eulji University (KR)
  • Seoyeong University (KR)
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Korea.
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Kundong University (KR)
ORCID
Venue
Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
Publisher
Korean Society of Women Health Nursing
Published
2011
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
225
ISSN
1225-9543 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.4069/kjwhn.2011.17.3.225
OpenAlex
W2083013929
Cited by
14
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
ko
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Korean journal of women health nursing/Yeoseong geon'gang ganho hag'hoeji/Yeoseong geon-gang ganho hakoeji (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
nursing students, clinical nursing practice, women's health nursing, student satisfaction, clinical performance, obstetric nursing, gynecologic nursing, labor and delivery, nursing education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review