Cited by 800Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Patient Preference for Psychological vs Pharmacologic Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-Analytic Review

Open access
McHugh, R. Kathryn, Whitton, Sarah W., Peckham, Andrew D., Welge, Jeffrey A., Otto, Michael W.·2013·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based practice involves the consideration of efficacy and effectiveness, clinical expertise, and patient preference in treatment selection. However, patient preference for psychiatric treatment has been understudied. The aim of this meta-analytic review was to provide an estimate of the proportion of patients preferring psychological treatment relative to medication for psychiatric disorders. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Collaboration library through August 2011 for studies written in English that assessed adult patient preferences for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The following search terms and subject headings were used in combination: patient preference, consumer preference, therapeutics, psychotherapy, drug therapy, mental disorders, depression, anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, substance-related disorder, eating disorder, and personality disorder. In addition, the reference sections of identified articles were examined to locate any additional articles not captured by this search. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that assessed preferred type of treatment and included at least 1 psychological treatment and 1 pharmacologic treatment were included. Of the 644 articles identified, 34 met criteria for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Authors extracted relevant data including the proportion of participants reporting preference for psychological or pharmacologic treatment. RESULTS: The proportion of adult patients preferring psychological treatment was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69-0.80), which was significantly higher than equivalent preference (ie, higher than 0.50; P < .001). Sensitivity analyses suggested that younger patients (P = .05) and women (P < .01) were significantly more likely to choose psychological treatment. A preference for psychological treatment was consistently evident in both treatment-seeking and unselected (ie, non-treatment-seeking) samples (P < .001 for both) but was somewhat stronger for unselected samples. CONCLUSIONS: Aggregation of patient preferences across diverse settings yielded a significant 3-fold preference for psychological treatment. Given evidence for enhanced outcomes among those receiving their preferred psychiatric treatment and the trends for decreasing utilization of psychotherapy, strategies to maximize the linkage of patients to preferred care are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.12r07757

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Finding

    Preference for psychological treatment was consistently present in both treatment-seeking and unselected samples, though it was somewhat stronger in unselected samples.

    “A preference for psychological treatment was consistently evident in both treatment-seeking and unselected samples (ps < .05), but was somewhat stronger for the unselected samples.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    The combined population mean proportion preferring therapy was 0.75.

    “The population mean proportion preferring therapy was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.80), which is significantly higher than 0.50 (p < 0.001), the proportion that would indicate equal preference for psychological and pharmacological treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    The paper states that adults prefer psychological to pharmacological treatment for unipolar depression and anxiety disorders.

    “This meta-analysis provides evidence that adults prefer psychological to pharmacological treatment for unipolar depression and anxiety disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    Depression was the most commonly studied disorder, followed by posttraumatic stress disorder, other or unspecified disorders, and other anxiety disorders.

    “the most commonly examined disorder was depression (65% of studies), followed by posttraumatic stress disorder (17%), other or unspecified disorders (12%), and other anxiety disorders (6%).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Finding

    The authors conclude that combining preferences across settings shows a three-fold preference for psychological treatment over medication.

    “Aggregation of patient preferences across diverse settings yielded a significant three-fold preference for psychological treatment relative to medication.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting counts of initially identified studies

    Minor

    The abstract says 641 articles were initially identified, while the Trial Flow section says 644 studies were initially identified and screened.

1 of 1

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 800

Authors
McHugh, R. K., Whitton, S. W., Peckham, A. D., Welge, J. A., & Otto, M. W.
Affiliations
  • McLean Hospital (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
McHugh, R. Kathryn
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2013-06-15
Volume
74
Issue
06
Pages
595-602
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978560738
Cited by
800
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
54.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr026314-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH084784, R25 MH08478)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1-RR026314, 5UL1RR026314-02)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
patient preferences, psychological intervention, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, mental illness, treatment selection, depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance-related disorders, eating disorders, personality disorders, insomnia, gender differences, age differences, treatment seeking, unselected patients, psychotherapy utilization
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Mental Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Sex Characteristics, Publication Bias, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read (extract-v1) on 2026-09-24.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review