Cited by 6Schizophrenia research and treatmentArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Do Advanced Statistical Techniques Really Help in the Diagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome in Patients Treated With Second-Generation Antipsychotics?

Van Schependom, Jeroen, Yu, Weiping, Gielen, Jeroen, Laton, Jorne, De Keyser, Jacques, De Hert, Marc, Nagels, Guy·2015·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic and cardiovascular diseases in patients with schizophrenia have gained a lot of interest in recent years. Developing an algorithm to detect the metabolic syndrome based on readily available variables would eliminate the need for blood sampling, which is considered expensive and inconvenient in this population. METHOD: All patients fulfilled DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. We used the International Diabetes Federation criteria (European population) to diagnose the metabolic syndrome. We used logistic regression and optimized artificial neural networks and support vector machines to detect the metabolic syndrome in a cohort of schizophrenic patients of the University Psychiatric Center Kortenberg, KU Leuven, Belgium. Testing was done on one-third of the included cohort (202 patients); training was performed using a 10-fold stratified cross-validation scheme. The data were collected between 2000 and 2008. RESULTS: All 3 methods yielded similar results, with satisfying accuracies of about 80%. However, none of the advanced statistical methods could improve on the results obtained using a very simple and naive model including only central obesity and information on blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Although so-called pattern recognition techniques bear high promise in improving clinical decision making, the results should be presented with caution and preferably in comparison with a less complicated technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Schependom, J., Yu, W., Gielen, J., Laton, J., De Keyser, J., De Hert, M., & Nagels, G.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2015-10-21
Volume
76
Issue
10
Pages
e1292-e1299
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2184199669
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, atypical antipsychotics, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, abdominal obesity, blood pressure, diagnostic algorithm, artificial neural networks, support vector machine, logistic regression, pattern recognition, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Decision Trees, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, ROC Curve, Schizophrenia, Sensitivity and Specificity, Statistics as Topic, Antipsychotic Agents, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Logistic Models, Neural Networks, Computer, Metabolic Syndrome, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review