Cited by 29Mental Health Treatment and AccessEmployment and Welfare StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Depression in the US Population During the Time Periods Surrounding the Great Recession

Mehta, Kaushal, Kramer, Holly, Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon, Cao, Guichan, Tong, Liping, Rao, Murali·2015·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the time periods surrounding the 2008 US economic downturn were accompanied by an increase in prevalence of depression in the US adult population. METHOD: We used data from the 24,182 adults aged ≥ 18 years who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during 2005-2012. A cross-sectional analysis was performed at each time period to determine prevalence of major and other depression as assessed by standardized questionnaires based on 9 criteria for major depressive episodes defined by DSM-IV. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics of the US population were similar across time periods except for the percentage of adults living in poverty, which increased from 26.43% during 2005-2006 to 33.46% during 2011-2012. The prevalence of major depression increased from 2.33% (95% CI, 1.64%-3.01%) during 2005-2006 to 3.49% (95% CI, 2.84%-4.03%) in 2009-2010 to 3.79% (95% CI, 3.01%-4.57%) in 2011-2012. Prevalence of other depression increased from 4.10% (95% CI, 3.37%-4.88%) in 2005-2006 to 4.79% (95% CI, 4.10%-5.44%) in the 2009-2010 period but then declined to 3.68% (95% CI, 2.84%-4.48%) in the 2011-2012 time period (P = .4). After adjustment for the distribution of age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, insurance status, and poverty status in the US adult noninstitutionalized population, each 2-year period after the 2005-2006 time period was associated with a 0.4% increase in major depression prevalence (P < .001). No significant differences in other depression prevalence were noted by time period (P = .6). CONCLUSIONS: The time periods surrounding the recent economic recession were accompanied by a significant and sustained increase in major depression prevalence in the US population. It is plausible that the recession, given its strong, persistent, and negative effects on employment, job and housing security, and stock investments, contributed to the sustained increase in prevalence of major depression in the US population, but other factors associated with the recession time period could have played a role. The impact of the economic downturn on depression prevalence should be considered when formulating future policies and programs to promote and maintain the health of the US population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.14m09637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, K., Kramer, H., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Cao, G., Tong, L., & Rao, M.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2015-04-22
Volume
76
Issue
04
Pages
e499-e504
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000407373
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression prevalence, Great Recession, economic recession, major depressive episode, poverty, economic hardship, mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Infant, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Poverty, Sex Factors, United States, Insurance Coverage, Young Adult, Economic Recession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review