Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Identifying specific clinical symptoms of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia versus differential psychiatric disorders in patients presenting with a late-onset frontal lobe syndrome

Dols, Annemiek, van Liempt, Saskia, Gossink, Flora, Krudop, Welmoed A., Sikkes, Sietske, Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L., Stek, Max L.·2016·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Early differentiation between psychiatric disorders and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is of paramount importance in patients with the late-onset frontal lobe syndrome. As bvFTD in patients will deteriorate, psychiatric disorders are treatable. To date, misdiagnosis often occurs due to an overlap of symptoms and lack of specific biomarkers. The aim of our study was to investigate whether specific symptoms could separate bvFTD from psychiatric disorders. Methods In a naturalistic, prospective, multicenter study, 137 patients (aged 45-75 years, 72% male) with a late-onset frontal lobe syndrome were included based on their scores on the Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) and the Stereotypy Rating Inventory (SRI) from April 2011 to June 2013. In a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, diagnoses were established based on elaborate neuropsychological testing, magnetic resonance imaging, fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and clinical examination by a neurologist and a psychiatrist based on the International bvFTD Criteria Consortium for bvFTD and DSM-IV-TR criteria for psychiatric disorders. Results Forty-four subjects (32.8%) were diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, 10 (7.3%) with possible bvFTD, and 45 (32.8%) with probable bvFTD. A logistic regression analysis was performed with "psychiatry or bvFTD" as dependent variable and clinical variables (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], SRI,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.15m09844

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) overall score does not distinguish bvFTD from PPD.

    “the overall score does not distinguish bvFTD from PPD (Kertesz et al. , 2000; Alberici et al. , 2007; Milan et al. , 2008; Krudop et al. , 2015; Dols et al. , 2016; Suhonen et al. , 2017).”
  • Specific FBI sub-items that support bvFTD more than an idiopathic psychiatric state are aphasia and verbal apraxia, indifference/emotional flatness, alien hand and apraxia, and inappropriateness, whereas irritability is more indicative of PPD.

    “The specific sub-items of the FBI that have been found to support bvFTD more than an idiopathic psychiatric state are 'aphasia and verbal apraxia, indifference/emotional flatness, alien hand and apraxia, and inappropriateness' whereas 'irritability' is more indicative of a PPD (Kertesz et al. , 2000; Dols et al. , 2016).”
  • Stereotypies are more commonly present in bvFTD than in patients with similar presenting symptoms but a final diagnosis of PPD.

    “stereotypies were shown to be more commonly present in bvFTD than in patients with similar presenting symptoms but with a final diagnosis of PPD (Krudop et al. , 2015; Dols et al. , 2016).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dols, A., van Liempt, S., Gossink, F., Krudop, W. A., Sikkes, S., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., & Stek, M. L.
Affiliations
  • GGZ inGeest (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
77
Issue
10
Pages
1391-1395
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469101055
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, differential diagnosis, mental illness, Frontal Behavioral Inventory, irritability, impulsivity, apraxia of speech, depression, diagnostic biomarkers, misdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Mental Disorders, Compulsive Behavior, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Stereotyped Behavior, Comorbidity, Frontotemporal Dementia, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review