Cited by 10Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Predicting progression in the late onset frontal lobe syndrome

Open access
Gossink, Flora T., Vijverberg, Everard, Krudop, Welmoed, Scheltens, Philip, Stek, Max L., Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L., Dols, Annemiek·2019·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

ABSTRACTA late onset frontal lobe syndrome (LOF) refers to a clinical syndrome with apathy, disinhibition, or stereotypical behavior arising in middle or late adulthood. Diagnostics are challenging, and both clinicians and patients need reliable predictors of progression to improve clinical guidance. In this longitudinal multicenter and genetically screened prospective study, 137 LOF patients with frontal behavior (FBI score≥11) and/or stereotypical behavior (SRI≥10) were included. Progression was defined as institutionalization, death, or progression of frontal or temporal atrophy at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after two years of follow up. Absence of progression at MRI in addition to stable or improved Mini Mental State Examination and Frontal Assessment Battery scores after two years was indicative for non-progression. The presence of stereotypy and a neuropsychological profile with executive deficits at baseline were found to be predictive for progression, while a history and family history with psychiatric disorders were predictors for non-progression. The combination of these clinical markers had a predictive value of 80.4% (p < 0.05). In patients presenting with late onset behavioral symptoms, an appraisal of the rate of deterioration can be made by detailed mapping of clinical symptoms. Distinction of progressive discourses from non-progressive or treatable conditions is to be gained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610218001242

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gossink, F. T., Vijverberg, E., Krudop, W., Scheltens, P., Stek, M. L., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., & Dols, A.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Gossink, Flora T.
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
743-748
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898094620
Cited by
10
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
progression prediction, apathy, disinhibition, stereotypy, frontal lobe atrophy, temporal lobe atrophy, executive dysfunction, Frontal Assessment Battery, family history of mental illness, institutionalization
MeSH terms
Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Aged, Atrophy, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Logistic Models, Disease Progression, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review