Cited by 96Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychometric Reevaluation of the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Findings From a Prospective, Inpatient Cohort of Severely Mentally Ill Adults

Madan, Alok, Frueh, B. Christopher, Allen, Jon G., Ellis, Thomas E., Rufino, Katrina A., Oldham, John M., Fowler, J. Christopher·2016·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate prediction of suicide remains elusive due to lack of predictive measures. Given the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale's (C-SSRS) emerging "gold-standard" status for risk assessment, studies are needed to assess its psychometric properties, particularly predictive validity. The current study adds to the limited literature by assessing the C-SSRS's internal consistency, factor structure, concurrent validity, and predictive validity. METHODS: In this longitudinal study of 1,055 adults with DSM-IV diagnoses consecutively admitted to a specialized psychiatric hospital between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2014, patients completed standardized assessments, including the C-SSRS, at admission and 2, 12, and 24 weeks postdischarge. RESULTS: The C-SSRS evidenced excellent internal consistency (ordinal α = .95). Principal components analysis (PCA) revealed a 2-factor solution, accounting for 65.3% of the variance across items. The severity of ideation and behavioral items loaded onto the first factor, and the intensity of ideation items loaded onto the second factor. The total score, factors, and the most severe ideation single item were moderately correlated with other measures of suicidality (0.27 ≤ r ≤ 0.58; P < .0001). The summary score from the ideation/behavior factor was found to be modestly correlated with any suicide-related behavior within the 6 months following hospitalization. Receiver operator characteristics indicated that the C-SSRS performed adequately in correctly classifying any suicide-related behavior within 6 months of discharge from the hospital (AUC = 0.757, P < .001) with the total score and summary score from the ideation/behavior factor providing the best balance between sensitivity (0.694) and specificity (0.652-0.674). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to assess the factor structure of the C-SSRS in a large, high-risk sample. The measure has solid psychometric properties and merits use as a suicide risk assessment measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.15m10069

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madan, A., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Ellis, T. E., Rufino, K. A., Oldham, J. M., & Fowler, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
  • University of Houston - Downtown (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-27
Volume
77
Issue
07
Pages
e867-e873
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2492926143
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, suicide risk assessment, suicide risk prediction, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, factor structure, predictive validity, concurrent validity, internal consistency, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Suicide, Attempted, Risk Assessment, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review