Cited by 13Tryptophan and brain disordersTreatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Repeated Low-Grade Infections Predict Antidepressant-Resistant Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Jeng, Jia-Shyun, Li, Cheng-Ta, Chen, Mu-Hong, Lin, Wei-Chen, Bai, Ya-Mei, Tsai, Shih-Jen, Su, Tung-Ping, Chang, Wen-Hang, Sung, Yen-Jen·2018·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between severe inflammation and clinical depression in the context of major medical illnesses has been addressed, but the relationship between inflammation caused by mild infections and clinical depression is unclear. We aimed to examine whether a history of repeated low-grade infections (RLGI) in medically healthy subjects (MHS) could increase their vulnerability to major depressive disorder (MDD) (ICD-9-CM) and whether RLGI could be associated with higher resistance to antidepressants in those developing MDD. METHOD: A nationwide, population-based cohort study (January 1996 to December 2011) was conducted for MHS with and without a history of RLGI. The rates of MDD during an up to 8-year follow-up period were compared between the 2 groups in 2 independent cohorts. The stratified responses to adequate antidepressant trials, including easy-to-treat (ETT) and difficult-to-treat (DTT) responses, were also compared in the MDD patients. RESULTS: During the follow-up, the 2 cohorts consistently revealed that the RLGI(+) (ie, high-inflammation; n = 727) group had a significantly higher chance of developing MDD over time than the RLGI(-) (ie, low-inflammation; n = 443) group: Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that the hazard ratio associated with a history of RLGI was 1.369 to 1.911 (P < .001), after adjusting for confounding factors. The RLGI(+) group was consistently associated with a higher likelihood of DTT responses than was the RLGI(-) group (Cohort-2002: 11.5% vs 7.6%; Cohort-2004: 11.8% vs 4.3%; P < .05 by Wald χ² tests in both cohorts). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale retrospective cohort study to report a reliable temporal association between a history of RLGI and subsequent diagnosis of MDD and poor responses to antidepressants in 2 independent cohorts. Our data support the view that repeated mild infections play a role in the pathophysiology of MDD and antidepressant-resistant depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.17m11540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jeng, J.-S., Li, C.-T., Chen, M.-H., Lin, W.-C., Bai, Y.-M., Tsai, S.-J., Su, T.-P., Chang, W.-H., & Sung, Y.-J.
Affiliations
Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2018-02-21
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
17m11540
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771475710
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
antidepressant-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, inflammation, infection history, antidepressant response, difficult-to-treat depression, depression pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Infections, Male, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review