Cited by 39Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTryptophan and brain disorders

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the mGlu2/3 Negative Allosteric Modulator Decoglurant in Partially Refractory Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Umbricht, Daniel, Niggli, Markus, Sanwald-Ducray, Patricia, Deptula, Dennis, Moore, Rema, Grünbauer, Waltraud, Boak, Lauren, Fontoura, Paulo·2020·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess putative antidepressant and procognitive effects of decoglurant, a selective metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2/3 (mGlu2/3) negative allosteric modulator, as adjunctive treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) in patients with partially refractory major depressive disorder (MDD), diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria. METHODS: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial consisted of 4 weeks' screening, 6 weeks' treatment, and 8 weeks' follow-up between September 2011 and June 2014. Individuals with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 25 and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score ≥ 4, despite up to 2 adequate trials of an SSRI/SNRI and compliance confirmed by positive SSRI/SNRI blood levels, were randomized to decoglurant 5 mg (n = 101), 15 mg (n = 102), or 30 mg (n = 55) daily or placebo (n = 99) as adjunct to ongoing treatment with 1 SSRI/SNRI. An adaptive design was used with an interim analysis after 30 patients in each group had received 6 weeks' treatment. The primary outcome variable was change in MADRS total score from baseline to end of treatment. Primary assessments were performed by fully blinded centralized raters. RESULTS: Of 357 participants, 310 completed 6 weeks' treatment. At 6 weeks, no significant differences between any active treatment arm and placebo in reducing MADRS total score or response or remission rates were observed. Decoglurant exerted no significant effects on Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery cognitive accuracy and cognitive speed composite scores or on secondary measures of mood and functioning. A relatively high placebo response was observed, which may have constrained the ability to detect treatment effects. No deaths occurred; few patients reported serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Decoglurant was well tolerated overall but did not exert any antidepressant or procognitive effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01457677.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.18m12470

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RO4995819 (decoglurant), an mGluR2/3 NAM, completed Phase 1 and a Phase 2 trial in partially refractory MDD, but no significant differences were observed between decoglurant and placebo.

    “RO4995819 (decoglurant), an mGluR2/3 NAM, has also completed Phase 1 clinical trials and a Phase 2 trial in partially refractory MDD, but no significant differences were observed between decoglurant and placebo [195]”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [195]

  • At 6 weeks, decreases in MADRS scores were noted from baseline with decoglurant but without reaching statistical significance when compared to the placebo group, failing the primary endpoint, and for the secondary endpoints, mood and functioning and cognitive impairment, it also failed to separate from the placebo group.

    “At 6 weeks, decreases in MADRS scores were noted from baseline, but without reaching statistical significance when compared to the placebo group, failing the primary endpoint, and, for the secondary endpoints, mood and functioning and cognitive impairment, it has also failed in separate from the placebo group.”
  • Decoglurant (Roche), an mGlu2/3 antagonist receptor, was tested in a large clinical trial (n = 370) where the primary objective was to access antidepressive and procognitive effects of the compound versus placebo as an adjunctive therapy to SSRI/SNRI therapy in individuals with TRD.

    “Decoglurant (Roche), an mGlu2/3 antagonist receptor, was tested in a large clinical trial (n = 370), where the primary objective was to access antidepressive and procongnitive of the compound versus placebo as an adjunctive therapy to SSRI/SNRI therapy in individuals with TRD [140].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Fostick L, Silberman A, Beckman M, et al. The economic impact of depression: resistance or severity? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;20(10):671-675.
  2. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 2. Salomon JA, Vos T, Hogan DR, et al. Common values in assessing health outcomes from disease and injury: disability weights measurement study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2129-2143. · DOI
  3. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 3. Lasalvia A, Zoppei S, Van Bortel T, et al; ASPEN/ INDIGO Study Group. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2013;381(9860):55-62. · DOI · Paper page
  4. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 4. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905-1917. · DOI · Paper page
  5. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 5. Goeldner C, Ballard TM, Knoflach F, et al. Cognitive impairment in major depression and the mGlu2 receptor as a therapeutic target. Neuropharmacology. 2013;64:337-346. · DOI · Paper page
  6. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 6. Bhalla RK, Butters MA, Mulsant BH, et al. Persistence of neuropsychologic deficits in the remitted state of late-life depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;14(5):419-427. · DOI · Paper page
  7. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 7. McDermott LM, Ebmeier KP. A meta-analysis of depression severity and cognitive function. J Affect Disord. 2009;119(1-3):1-8. u M e d C r o s s R e f 8. Rock PL, Roiser JP, Riedel WJ, et al. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44(10):2029-2040. · DOI · Paper page
  8. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 9. McIntyre RS, Harrison J, Loft H, et al. The effects of vortioxetine on cognitive function in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;19(10):pyw055. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 10. Duman RS, Li N, Liu RJ, et al. Signaling pathways underlying the rapid antidepressant actions of ketamine. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(1):35-41. · DOI · Paper page
  9. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 11. Lapidus KAB, Levitch CF, Perez AM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of intranasal ketamine in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76(12):970-976. · DOI · Paper page
  10. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 12. McGirr A, Berlim MT, Bond DJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ketamine in the rapid treatment of major depressive episodes. Psychol Med. 2015;45(4):693-704. · DOI · Paper page
  11. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 13. Quiroz JA, Tamburri P, Deptula D, et al. Efficacy and safety of basimglurant as adjunctive therapy for major depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(7):675-684. · DOI · Paper page
  12. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 14. Dwyer JM, Lepack AE, Duman RS. mTOR activation is required for the antidepressant effects of mGluR 2/3 blockade. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;15(4):429-434. · DOI · Paper page
  13. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 15. Higgins GA, Ballard TM, Kew JN, et al. Pharmacological manipulation of mGlu2 receptors influences cognitive performance in the rodent. Neuropharmacology. 2004;46(7):907-917. · DOI · Paper page
  14. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 16. Campo B, Kalinichev M, Lambeng N, et al. Characterization of an mGluR2/3 negative allosteric modulator in rodent models of depression. J Neurogenet. 2011;25(4):152-166. · DOI
  15. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 17. Hikichi H, Kaku A, Karasawa J, et al. Stimulation of metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) 2 receptor and blockade of mGlu1 receptor improve social memory impairment elicited by MK-801 in rats. J Pharmacol Sci. 2013;122(1):10-16. · DOI
  16. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 18. Lundström L, Bissantz C, Beck J, et al. Structural determinants of allosteric antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptor 2: mechanistic studies with new potent negative allosteric modulators. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(2b):521-537. · DOI
  17. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 19. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH): Good clinical practice E6 (R1). ICH website. https://www.ich.org/page/efficacy- guidelines. 1996. Accessed January 8, 2018. · DOI
  18. Chandler GM, Iosifescu DV, Pollack MH, et al. RESEARCH: Validation of the Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant History Questionnaire (ATRQ). CNS Neurosci Ther. 2010;16:322-325.
  19. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 21. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134(4):382-389. · DOI · Paper page
  20. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 22. Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. DHEW Publication No. 76-338. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976:217-222. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sahakian BJ, Owen AM. Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry using CANTAB: discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1992;85(7):399-402.
  22. P u b M e d 24. Williams JBW, Kobak KA. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(1):52-58.
  23. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 25. Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Ibrahim HM, et al. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS- SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Med. 2004;34(1):73-82. · DOI · Paper page
  24. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 26. Fava M, Iosifescu DV, Pedrelli P, et al. Reliability and validity of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(2):91-97. · DOI · Paper page
  25. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 27. Sheehan DV. The Anxiety Disease. New York, NY: Scribner; 1983. · DOI
  26. Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, et al. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):321-326.
  27. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266-1277.
  28. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 30. Chouinard G, Margolese HC. Manual for the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). Schizophr Res. 2005;76(2-3):247-265. · DOI · Paper page
  29. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 31. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, et al. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133(5):429-435. · DOI
  30. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 32. Uher R, Perlis RH, Henigsberg N, et al. Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms. Psychol Med. 2012;42(5):967-980. · DOI · Paper page
  31. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f See supplementary material for this article at . · DOI · Paper page
  32. Stein DJ, Baldwin DS, Dolberg OT, et al. Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? an analysis of placebo-controlled studies of escitalopram. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(11):1741-1746.
  33. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 34. Chen JA, Papakostas GI, Youn SJ, et al. Association between patient beliefs regarding assigned treatment and clinical response: reanalysis of data from the Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(12):1669-1676. · DOI
  34. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 35. Iovieno N, Papakostas GI. Correlation between different levels of placebo response rate and clinical trial outcome in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(10):1300-1306. · DOI · Paper page
  35. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 36. Rutherford BR, Roose SP. A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(7):723-733. · DOI
  36. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 37. Papakostas GI, Østergaard SD, Iovieno N. The nature of placebo response in clinical studies of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(4):456-466. · DOI · Paper page
  37. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 38. Khan A, Fahl Mar K, Faucett J, et al. Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(2):181-192. · DOI
  38. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 39. Kobak KA, Leuchter A, DeBrota D, et al. Site versus centralized raters in a clinical depression trial: impact on patient selection and placebo response. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;30(2):193-197. · DOI
  39. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 40. Freeman MP, Pooley J, Flynn MJ, et al. Guarding the gate: remote structured assessments to enhance enrollment precision in depression trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;37(2):176-181. · DOI
  40. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 41. Khan A, Kolts RL, Thase ME, et al. Research design features and patient characteristics associated with the outcome of antidepressant clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(11):2045-2049. · DOI
  41. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 42. Fava GA, Guidi J, Rafanelli C, et al. The clinical inadequacy of the placebo model and the development of an alternative conceptual framework. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(6):332-340. · DOI
  42. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 43. Ratti E, Bettica P, Alexander R, et al. Full central neurokinin-1 receptor blockade is required for efficacy in depression: evidence from orvepitant clinical studies. J Psychopharmacol. 2013;27(5):424-434. · DOI · Paper page
  43. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 44. Thase ME, Trivedi MH, Nelson JC, et al. Examining the efficacy of adjunctive aripiprazole in major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 2 studies. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(6): 440-447. · DOI · Paper page
  44. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 45. Trivedi MH, Thase ME, Osuntokun O, et al. An integrated analysis of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination in clinical trials of treatment- resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(3):387-396. · DOI
  45. P u M e d C r o s s R e f · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Umbricht, D., Niggli, M., Sanwald-Ducray, P., Deptula, D., Moore, R., Grünbauer, W., Boak, L., & Fontoura, P.
Affiliations
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
Umbricht, Daniel
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2020-07-14
Volume
81
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W3043046802
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
mGluR2/3, negative allosteric modulators, major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, adjunctive antidepressant therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, procognitive effects, cognitive speed, placebo response, antidepressant efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Allosteric Regulation, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review