Cited by 56Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies

Association Between Patient Beliefs Regarding Assigned Treatment and Clinical Response: Reanalysis of Data From the Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group

Chen, Justin A., Papakostas, George I., Youn, Soo Jeong, Baer, Lee, Clain, Alisabet J., Fava, Maurizio, Mischoulon, David·2011·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To reanalyze data from a 2002 study by the Hypericum Depression Trial Study Group to determine whether patients who believed they were receiving active therapy rather than placebo obtained greater improvement, independent of treatment. METHOD: Three hundred forty adults with major depressive disorder (according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV) and baseline scores of ≥ 20 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) were randomized to Hypericum perforatum 900-1,500 mg/d, sertraline 50-100 mg/d, or placebo and were asked to guess their assigned treatment after 8 weeks. This reanalysis of data was performed from October 1, 2009, to April 15, 2011. The intent-to-treat sample included 207 subjects (mean age = 44 years) who had (1) at least 1 postbaseline visit; (2) adherence data based on serum levels of hyperforin, sertraline, and desmethylsertraline; and (3) guess data. Univariate factorial analysis of variance was used to determine whether treatment assignment affected clinical improvement according to HDRS-17 score and whether this effect was moderated by patient guess of sertraline, Hypericum, or placebo. Analysis of covariance was used to determine whether side effects mediated improvement in the context of patient guess and assigned treatment. χ₂ analyses compared response rates (≥ 50% decrease in HDRS-17 score) between the guess groups and between the treatment groups within each guess group. RESULTS: Assigned treatment had no significant effect on clinical improvement (P = .65), but patient guess was significantly associated with improvement (P < .001), and treatment and guess interacted significantly (P = .005). Among subjects who guessed placebo, clinical improvement was small and did not differ significantly across treatments. Among subjects who guessed Hypericum, improvement was large and did not differ significantly across treatments. Among subjects who guessed sertraline, those who received placebo or sertraline had large improvements, but those who received Hypericum had significantly less improvement (P < .001). Similar findings were obtained for response rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patient beliefs regarding treatment may have a stronger association with clinical outcome than the actual medication received, and the strength of this association may depend upon the particular combination of treatment guessed and treatment received.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.10m06453

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J. A., Papakostas, G. I., Youn, S. J., Baer, L., Clain, A. J., Fava, M., & Mischoulon, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mischoulon, David
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2011-10-04
Volume
72
Issue
12
Pages
1669-1676
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084434457
Cited by
56
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh070007-004)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH070007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Keywords
patient beliefs, treatment expectations, placebo effect, major depressive disorder, Hypericum perforatum, sertraline, antidepressant response, treatment allocation, hyperforin, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Middle Aged, Patients, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Sertraline, Hypericum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review