Cited by 16Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toward a Comprehensive Developmental Model of Prescription Opioid Use Disorder

Blanco, Carlos, Wall, Melanie M., Liu, Shang-Min, Olfson, Mark·2019·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To develop a comprehensive etiologic model of DSM-5 prescription opioid use disorder (POUD) based on Kendler and colleagues' development model for major depressive disorder. Methods Data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (2012-2013). Risk factors were divided into 4 developmental tiers (childhood/early adolescence, late adolescence, adulthood, past year). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to examine the independent contribution of each risk factor. Separate models were built to predict 12-month nonmedical use of prescription opioids and risk of POUD among those with 12-month nonmedical use. Results After adjustment for other risk factors, the odds of past 12-month nonmedical use of prescription opioids were increased by history of trauma, social deviance, and use of drugs other than opioids in adulthood and by past-year pain, alcohol use disorder (AUD), tobacco use disorder, any Axis I disorder other than SUD, and number of stressful events. History of POUD in adulthood and pain, AUD, tobacco use disorder, and any Axis I disorder other than substance use disorders (SUD) in the past year increased the odds of 12-month POUD. History of SUD other than POUD in adulthood was associated with lower odds of POUD. For both outcomes, the effect of earlier development tiers was mediated by more proximal ones. Conclusions A modification of Kendler and colleagues' model for major depressive disorder provides a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.19m12775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blanco, C., Wall, M. M., Liu, S.-M., & Olfson, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2019-12-03
Volume
81
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2101
OpenAlex
W2993499517
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
prescription opioid use disorder, developmental model, etiology, nonmedical opioid use, childhood trauma, social deviance, polydrug use, pain, alcoholism, tobacco use disorder, life events, comorbid substance use disorders, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Opioid-Related Disorders, Risk Factors, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review