Cited by 89Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Double-Blind Comparison of Fluvoxamine and Paroxetine in the Treatment of Depressed Outpatients

Kiev, Ari, Feiger, Alan·1997·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Fluvoxamine and paroxetine, both serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), were compared at two centers in a 7-week double-blind study in outpatients with major depression, diagnosed by DSM-III-R criteria. Method Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive dosage titrated upward to between 50-150 mg/day of fluvoxamine (N = 30) or 20-50 mg/day of paroxetine (N = 30). The mean +/- SD daily dose administered at the last assessment was 102 +/- 44 mg/day for fluvoxamine and 36 +/- 13 mg/day for paroxetine. Sixteen (53%) fluvoxamine-treated patients and 10 (33%) paroxetine-treated patients were titrated to the maximum permissible dosage of either drug. Sample size was calculated to provide at least 85% power at 5% level of significance to detect at least a 1.00-point difference in mean severity of adverse events, assuming a standard deviation of 1.0. Results Fluvoxamine and paroxetine were similarly effective in ameliorating depression as demonstrated by mean total scores of 10.9 +/- 7.3 (p Conclusion Observed differences in some side effects, although not statistically significant, indicate that when a patient has difficulty tolerating one SSRI, the clinician may choose to change to a different agent within the same class.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v58n0402

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In depressed outpatients comparing fluvoxamine (50-150 mg/day) and paroxetine (20-50 mg/day), somnolence was reported in 30% of the paroxetine group and 40% of the fluvoxamine group.

    “Kiev and Feiger [1997] compared fluvoxamine (50-150 mg/day) and paroxetine (20-50 mg/day) in depressed outpatients.Somnolence was reported in 30% of the paroxetine group and 40% of the fluvoxamine group.”

    From Depression, sleep physiology, and antidepressant drugs (2001) · cites this paper as Kiev and Feiger, 1997

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kiev, A., & Feiger, A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
1997-04-15
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
146-152
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057162218
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
fluvoxamine, paroxetine, major depressive disorder, outpatients, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressant efficacy, adverse events, drug tolerability, dose titration, sexual dysfunction, sleepiness, headache, nausea, xerostomia, sweating, insomnia, asthenia, dyspepsia, erectile dysfunction, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Depressive Disorder, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep, Sweating, Xerostomia, Fluvoxamine, Treatment Outcome, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review