Cited by 65Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Predictors of Relapse During Fluoxetine Continuation or Maintenance Treatment of Major Depression

McGrath, Patrick J., Stewart, Jonathan W., Petkova, Eva, Quitkin, Frederic M., Amsterdam, Jay D., Fawcett, Jan, Reimherr, Frederick W., Rosenbaum, Jerrold F. +1 more·2000·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal was to examine predictors of relapse during continuation/maintenance treatment of major depression that had remitted following 12 to 14 weeks of fluoxetine therapy. METHOD: The study utilizes data collected in a collaborative clinical trial including patients with DSM-III-R major depression at 5 university-affiliated outpatient psychiatry clinics. Three hundred ninety-five patients who remitted with fluoxetine therapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: fluoxetine for 14 weeks followed by placebo for 36 weeks, fluoxetine for 38 weeks followed by placebo for 12 weeks, fluoxetine for 50 weeks, or placebo for 50 weeks. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of time to relapse. RESULTS: In addition to the previously reported longitudinal pattern of response during acute treatment, neurovegetative symptom pattern was a predictor of fluoxetine benefit compared with placebo. Greater chronicity predicted poorer survival, which was not differential by treatment. The most robust advantage of fluoxetine was seen for patients with endogenous vegetative symptoms, chronic depression, and acute treatment response characterized by onset in the third week or later and persistence of response once attained. CONCLUSION: Both nonspecific pattern of response and neurovegetative symptoms characteristic of atypical depression were predictive of lack of fluoxetine efficacy in continuation/ maintenance treatment. These findings have importance for both clinical management and analyses of future maintenance trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v61n0710

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In McGrath et al. (2000), melancholic MDD patients appeared to show a larger drug-placebo difference.

    “In McGrath et al. (2000), patients with melancholic MDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition Revised; DSM-III-R) appeared to show a larger drug–placebo difference than those with non-melancholic MDD due to increased survival in the melancholic group assigned to maintenance fluoxetine (log rank = 29.3, df = 3, p = 1.9 × 10−6).”

    From Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as McGrath et al. (2000)

  • Neurovegetative symptoms moderated an effect of treatment response specificity.

    “Neurovegetative symptoms moderated an effect of treatment response specificity (McGrath et al. 2000; see also below for response specificity).”

    From Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as McGrath et al. 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGrath, P. J., Stewart, J. W., Petkova, E., Quitkin, F. M., Amsterdam, J. D., Fawcett, J., Reimherr, F. W., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Beasley, C. M.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Rush University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2000-07-15
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
518-524
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978778166
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
major depressive disorder, fluoxetine, recurrence prediction, continuation treatment, maintenance therapy, neurovegetative symptoms, atypical depression, chronic depression, endogenous depression, treatment response, placebo response, predictors of treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluoxetine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Age of Onset, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review