Predictors of Relapse During Fluoxetine Continuation or Maintenance Treatment of Major Depression
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal was to examine predictors of relapse during continuation/maintenance treatment of major depression that had remitted following 12 to 14 weeks of fluoxetine therapy. METHOD: The study utilizes data collected in a collaborative clinical trial including patients with DSM-III-R major depression at 5 university-affiliated outpatient psychiatry clinics. Three hundred ninety-five patients who remitted with fluoxetine therapy were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: fluoxetine for 14 weeks followed by placebo for 36 weeks, fluoxetine for 38 weeks followed by placebo for 12 weeks, fluoxetine for 50 weeks, or placebo for 50 weeks. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify predictors of time to relapse. RESULTS: In addition to the previously reported longitudinal pattern of response during acute treatment, neurovegetative symptom pattern was a predictor of fluoxetine benefit compared with placebo. Greater chronicity predicted poorer survival, which was not differential by treatment. The most robust advantage of fluoxetine was seen for patients with endogenous vegetative symptoms, chronic depression, and acute treatment response characterized by onset in the third week or later and persistence of response once attained. CONCLUSION: Both nonspecific pattern of response and neurovegetative symptoms characteristic of atypical depression were predictive of lack of fluoxetine efficacy in continuation/ maintenance treatment. These findings have importance for both clinical management and analyses of future maintenance trials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In McGrath et al. (2000), melancholic MDD patients appeared to show a larger drug-placebo difference.
“In McGrath et al. (2000), patients with melancholic MDD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition Revised; DSM-III-R) appeared to show a larger drug–placebo difference than those with non-melancholic MDD due to increased survival in the melancholic group assigned to maintenance fluoxetine (log rank = 29.3, df = 3, p = 1.9 × 10−6).”
From Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as McGrath et al. (2000)
Neurovegetative symptoms moderated an effect of treatment response specificity.
“Neurovegetative symptoms moderated an effect of treatment response specificity (McGrath et al. 2000; see also below for response specificity).”
From Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as McGrath et al. 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cohen, L. S. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.5.499 · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Treatment of depression with atypical features: a meta-analytic approach
Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Allgaier, A.-K., Kohnen, R., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U. (2006) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.012 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Kaymaz, N., van Os, J., Loonen, A. J. M., & Nolan, W. A. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v69n0910 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Boulenger, J.-P., Loft, H., & Florea, I. (2012) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881112441866 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Goethe, J. W., Woolley, S. B., Cardoni, A. A., Woznicki, B. A., & Piez, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0b013e31815152a5 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Standardisation framework for the Maudsley staging method for treatment resistance in depression
Fekadu, A., Donocik, J. G., & Cleare, A. J. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1679-x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Predicting relapse after antidepressant withdrawal – a systematic review
Berwian, I. M., Walter, H., Seifritz, E., & Huys, Q. J. M. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716002580 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“Neurovegetative symptoms moderated an effect of treatment response specificity (McGrath et al. 2000; see also below for response specificity).”
InfluentialPharmacogenetics Studies in STAR*D: Strengths, Limitations, and Results
Laje, G., Perlis, R. H., Rush, A. J., & McMahon, F. J. (2009) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/ps.2009.60.11.1446 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Saragoussi, D., Touya, M., Haro, J. M., Jönsson, B., Knapp, M., Botrel, B., Florea, I., Loft, H., & Rive, B. (2017) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s136343 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Berwian, I. M., Wenzel, J. G., Kuehn, L., Schnuerer, I., Seifritz, E., Stephan, K. E., Walter, H., & Huys, Q. J. M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13893-9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- McGrath, P. J., Stewart, J. W., Petkova, E., Quitkin, F. M., Amsterdam, J. D., Fawcett, J., Reimherr, F. W., Rosenbaum, J. F., & Beasley, C. M.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Rush University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2000-07-15
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 518-524
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978778166
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, fluoxetine, recurrence prediction, continuation treatment, maintenance therapy, neurovegetative symptoms, atypical depression, chronic depression, endogenous depression, treatment response, placebo response, predictors of treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluoxetine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Age of Onset, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review