The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intramuscular Ziprasidone, 2 mg Versus 10 mg, in the Short-Term Management of Agitated Psychotic Patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a clear need for effective, well-tolerated intramuscular (i.m.) agents for the acute control of agitated psychotic patients. Currently used agents, including conventional antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines, may be associated with distressing side effects such as extrapyramidal side effects and excessive sedation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the rapid-acting i.m. formulation of the novel antipsychotic ziprasidone in the treatment of inpatients with psychosis and acute agitation (DSM-IV diagnoses). METHOD: In a 24-hour, double-blind, fixed-dose clinical trial, patients were randomly assigned to receive up to 4 injections (every 2 hours p.r.n.) of 2 mg (N = 54) or 10 mg (N = 63) of ziprasidone i.m. The Behavioral Activity Rating Scale measured behavioral symptoms at baseline and the response to treatment up to 4 hours after the first i.m. injection. RESULTS: Ziprasidone i.m., 10 mg, rapidly reduced symptoms of acute agitation and was significantly more effective (p < .01) than the 2-mg dose up to 4 hours after the first injection. Patients were calmed but not excessively sedated, and over half were classed as responders 2 hours after the 10-mg dose. No acute dystonia or behavioral disinhibition was reported. One patient who received the 10-mg dose experienced the extrapyramidal side effect akathisia. CONCLUSION: Ziprasidone i.m., 10 mg, is rapidly effective and well tolerated in the short-term management of the agitated psychotic patient. Comparison with a study of identical design comparing 2-mg with 20-mg doses in patients with similar levels of psychopathology suggests that efficacy with 10 mg or 20 mg of ziprasidone i.m. is significant and dose related.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yatham, L. N., Kennedy, S. H., Parikh, S. V., Schaffer, A., Bond, D. J., Frey, B. N., Sharma, V., Goldstein, B. I., Rej, S., Beaulieu, S., et al. (2018) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12609 · Cited by 1,852
“Sublingual asenapine (Level 3) (135) , haloperidol IM (Level 3) (132, 136, 137), haloperidol IM + midazolam IM (Level 3) (132, 138) , haloperidol IM + promethazine IM (Level 3) (132, 138, 139), risperidone ODT (Level 3) (137) , or ziprasidone IM (Level 3) (132, 138, 140) are recommended as a second line treatment.”
BackgroundSareen, J., Cox, B. J., Clara, I., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2005) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20072 · Cited by 389
Yatham, L. N., Kennedy, S. H., O'Donovan, C., Parikh, S., MacQueen, G., McIntyre, R., Sharma, V., Silverstone, P., Alda, M., Baruch, P., et al. (2005) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00219.x · Cited by 388
Risperidone for Treatment-Refractory Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Trial
Mahmoud, R. A., Pandina, G. J., Turkoz, I., Kosik-Gonzalez, C., Canuso, C. M., Kujawa, M. J., & Gharabawi-Garibaldi, G. M. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-9-200711060-00003 · Cited by 140
Ridout, F., Meadows, R., Johnsen, S., & Hindmarch, I. (2003) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.494 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesem, M. D., Zajecka, J. M., Swift, R. H., Reeves, K. R., & Harrigan, E. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-18
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043170894
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intramuscular Ziprasidone, 2 mg Versus 10 mg, in the Short-Term Management of Agitated Psychotic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v62n0104
- The paper
- Lesem, M. D., Zajecka, J. M., Swift, R. H., Reeves, K. R., & Harrigan, E. P. (2001). Intramuscular Ziprasidone, 2 mg Versus 10 mg, in the Short-Term Management of Agitated Psychotic Patients. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v62n0104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.