Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Our Reviewers: (Editorial)

Open access
Gelenberg, Alan J.·2004·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Article AbstractBecause this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.Now the most widely read journal in psychiatry and one of the most cited in the field, JCP is blessed with a growing number of manuscript submissions. What had previously been stacks of paper manuscripts that strained my back as well as eyes, now has become a stream of electrons, as JCP's submissin and review process went on-line at the beginning of 2003

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v65n0101

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Gelenberg, A. J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2004-01-15
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
4-7
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W150965689
Cited by
356
References
75
FWCI
246.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Our Reviewers: (Editorial). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4088/jcp.v65n0101
The paper
Gelenberg, A. J. (2004). Our Reviewers: (Editorial). The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.v65n0101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.